Re : Phoronix: NVIDIA GeForce 8 + 100.14.19 Redux

[deanjo]

"Our problems have mainly come down to the driver improperly reading the monitor's EDID information and other connection issues with GeForce 8 hardware. "

Actually the issue is not with the binary blobs as the nv driver suffers the same issue and it effects cards geforce 6 class and up.

[Source Of Radiance]

Purs like a kitten for me. Maybe it's because I already had an xorg.conf ready and didn't ask for the installer to mess it up for me?

[conholster]

Purs like a kitten for me. Maybe it's because I already had an xorg.conf ready and didn't ask for the installer to mess it up for me?

Same here even had nvidia-settings make a xorg.conf when I wanted to configure 2 monitors. No problems other than my DVI cable being to long, crappy picture on 42" TV.

[deanjo]

Yes it does not appear on all systems but with certain combinations of hardware and xorg 7.3. The nvidia-xconfig generates a working xorg because it does not generate a xorg.conf with a modes list. Some xorg utilities that do generate a modes list don't work.

[avsa242]

Just curious, but what is the specific problem with the EDID info? Does it produce modelines that are not correct for the display? I had this problem when installing Gutsy Gibbon fresh (though I believe it was using the open-source driver)...the installer utility reported the display resolution as 1680x1050 when in fact the mode was 1400x1050 (as reported by the display's built-in OSD).

Cheers,
Jesse

[Michael]

Just curious, but what is the specific problem with the EDID info? Does it produce modelines that are not correct for the display? I had this problem when installing Gutsy Gibbon fresh (though I believe it was using the open-source driver)...the installer utility reported the display resolution as 1680x1050 when in fact the mode was 1400x1050 (as reported by the display's built-in OSD).

Cheers,
Jesse

Incorrectly reporting the resolution, ignoring it when manually specifying the proper mode, and stuff like the picture @ http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=11124 which shows the Input isn't supported even when a picture is displaying and the picture is off the screen and does not auto adjust.

[archo]

I ran the NVIDIA installer to drop 100.14.19 on top of my working 100.14.11 installation. I didn't change any other configuration (well, I didn't let the installer mess with my xorg.conf), and after running Quake4, my FPS was only running around 30, where before I would have no trouble hitting the 60 FPS cap. I ran the 100.14.11 install to roll back (sort of) and the same Quake4 setup ran at the capped 60 FPS once again (the game is capped, I have vsync disabled). I have a Dell laptop with an integrated 8600M GT. I thought that the new driver was supposed to improve performance with the 8 seriers. Has anyone else experienced this with Quake4 or any other games?

[Kano]

Quake 4 is limited to 60 FPS in standard game mode. Only timedemos would run faster.

[archo]

Quake 4 is limited to 60 FPS in standard game mode. Only timedemos would run faster.

I understand, but I am getting less than 60 with 100.14.19. I used to hit the 60 cap with 100.14.11 with no trouble at all.

[archo]

Resolved - but I don't know why. I am running a custom 2.6.23 kernel, and I rebuilt 2.6.23-rc9, reinstalled the nvidia 100.14.19 package and performance is back up where it ought to be.

[Thetargos]

Maybe you missed some kernel options?