Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wayland's Weston 10 Alpha Brings Early Color Management Work, More Zero-Copy Scanout

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wayland's Weston 10 Alpha Brings Early Color Management Work, More Zero-Copy Scanout

    Phoronix: Wayland's Weston 10 Alpha Brings Early Color Management Work, More Zero-Copy Scanout

    The first alpha release of Weston 10.0 is now available as the next feature update to Wayland's reference compositor...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Typo:

    Originally posted by phoronix View Post
    This feedback support with linux-amdabuf-unstable-v1
    AMD Atomic/Asynchronous Buffer? Or did you mean dmabuf?

    Comment


    • #3
      This mysterious object called Weston, which nobody uses ...

      Comment


      • #4
        Wayland support has come a long way compared to less than one decade ago...”

        …that’s optimism for sure.

        Comment


        • #5
          Cool!
          I hope KDE developers can easily take it as an example to implement these improvements in Kwin.

          Comment


          • #6
            Haha... I forgot about Rebecca Black OS. I'm surprised it's still being updated.

            Comment


            • #7
              Dude omg my favourite distro

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Charlie68 View Post
                This mysterious object called Weston, which nobody uses ...
                It's actually used quite a bit in the embedded world. That's AFAIK why it lacks desktop features such as xdg-activation but has good (probably the best) hardware plane support.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Charlie68 View Post
                  This mysterious object called Weston, which nobody uses ...
                  Reference implementations do not need to be used. They just prove that whatever the protocol says, can be done. Otherwise Wayland might mandate the compositor must read your mind or other rubbish like that. And while that is an exaggeration, it is all too easy to slip something into a spec that can't actually be done or is insanely complicated to implement. A reference implementation makes sure that's not the case. It's also a starting point for implementors.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by bug77 View Post

                    Reference implementations do not need to be used. They just prove that whatever the protocol says, can be done. Otherwise Wayland might mandate the compositor must read your mind or other rubbish like that. And while that is an exaggeration, it is all too easy to slip something into a spec that can't actually be done or is insanely complicated to implement. A reference implementation makes sure that's not the case. It's also a starting point for implementors.
                    .. it was just a joke, complete with a smiley face.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X