Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PulseAudio 16.0 Released With A Variety Of Improvements

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PulseAudio 16.0 Released With A Variety Of Improvements

    Phoronix: PulseAudio 16.0 Released With A Variety Of Improvements

    While PipeWire continues gaining traction for fulfilling the audio management roles long handled by PulseAudio, the PulseAudio project itself continues progressing and successfully evolving its mature code-base. Out this weekend is PulseAudio 16.0...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    > PulseAudio's pactl command can now dump information in JSON format

    Better late than never, I guess. Had to write a parser for pactl's custom output format for a sink-switching utility I created six years ago or so. That was not particularly nice because of lots of weird text indentations...

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by archola View Post
      > PulseAudio's pactl command can now dump information in JSON format

      Better late than never, I guess. Had to write a parser for pactl's custom output format for a sink-switching utility I created six years ago or so. That was not particularly nice because of lots of weird text indentations...
      I mean, could you not have used the Pulseaudio API? It's not that bad lol.

      Comment


      • #4
        I wonder how long PulseAudio will be maintained, it's been replaced by default on my machines with PipeWire for a while now.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by microcode View Post
          I wonder how long PulseAudio will be maintained, it's been replaced by default on my machines with PipeWire for a while now.
          Obviously till no more applications need libpulse at compile time.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by microcode View Post

            I mean, could you not have used the Pulseaudio API? It's not that bad lol.
            Not really a realistic option for bash scripts.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by microcode View Post
              I wonder how long PulseAudio will be maintained, it's been replaced by default on my machines with PipeWire for a while now.
              Both are still equally useful for normal users who don't have low latency requirements.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by ClosedSource View Post

                Obviously till no more applications need libpulse at compile time.
                Are there any that aren't working with PipeWire Pulse left?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by caligula View Post

                  Both are still equally useful for normal users who don't have low latency requirements.
                  Please define normal users. There are issues with PulseAudio other than low latency.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by microcode View Post

                    Are there any that aren't working with PipeWire Pulse left?
                    No, but they all use the pulseaudio client library (libpulse). PipeWire pulse only replaces the server part of pulseaudio.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X