Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RNNoise 0.2 Released With AVX2 Optimizations For Neural Network Noise Suppression

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • RNNoise 0.2 Released With AVX2 Optimizations For Neural Network Noise Suppression

    Phoronix: RNNoise 0.2 Released With AVX2 Optimizations For Neural Network Noise Suppression

    Xiph.Org has released RNNoise 0.2 as the recurrent neural network for audio noise reduction. This library leverages a neural network model for enhancing real-time noise suppression...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Not sure what I should think about this, the best was always without any noise suppression.

    Comment


    • #3
      I highly reccomend people also try https://github.com/Rikorose/DeepFilterNet. I got results comparable with RTXnoise with it. and it's for sure my favourite one right now, Ill be testing 0.2 rnnoise against it for sure

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post
        I highly reccomend people also try https://github.com/Rikorose/DeepFilterNet. I got results comparable with RTXnoise with it. and it's for sure my favourite one right now, Ill be testing 0.2 rnnoise against it for sure
        Please, let us know how it went.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post
          I highly reccomend people also try https://github.com/Rikorose/DeepFilterNet. I got results comparable with RTXnoise with it. and it's for sure my favourite one right now, Ill be testing 0.2 rnnoise against it for sure
          It is a bit better then rnnoise but still worse than no suppression (judged from the github sample video).

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Anux View Post
            It is a bit better then rnnoise but still worse than no suppression (judged from the github sample video).
            You can't judge based on one video, you need to judge your usecase, below are clips tested from an original I recorded. let me know if I need to upload them else where. but here deepfilternet is massively preferable for me then no suppression

            EDIT: reuploaded

            original


            rnnoise


            rtx voice


            deepfilternet
            Last edited by Quackdoc; 15 April 2024, 08:45 AM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post

              You can't judge based on one video, you need to judge your usecase, below are clips tested from an original I recorded. let me know if I need to upload them else where. but here deepfilternet is massively preferable for me then no suppression

              deepfilternet
              https://files.catbox.moe/wrmcx4.flac
              Thanks, a lot. I agree, it depends heavily on the usecase.

              Last link has some garbage attached but worked after I removed it.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by slalomsk8er View Post

                Thanks, a lot. I agree, it depends heavily on the usecase.

                Last link has some garbage attached but worked after I removed it.
                weird, anyways this isn't rnnoise 0.2 but 0.1, I havent installed 0.2 yet. ill ping you when I do

                Comment


                • #9
                  slalomsk8er


                  It's not too bad, For sure an upgrade but I still prefer deepfilternet

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Quackdoc View Post
                    deepfilternet
                    THX, deepfilter is clearly the best but your original sample was already super easy to understand, no suppression needed. The samples from the rnnoise web page at 0 db with street noise were much more problematic maybe I try deepfilter with that.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X