Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

XFS Brings Bug Fixes & Minor Improvements To Linux 4.7

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • XFS Brings Bug Fixes & Minor Improvements To Linux 4.7

    Phoronix: XFS Brings Bug Fixes & Minor Improvements To Linux 4.7

    Dave Chinner has submitted the XFS file-system updates for the Linux 4.7 kernel merge window...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Just to drum up a little discussion; is there any point to using ext4 over XFS nowadays? I've been replacing ext4 with XFS for most things for a while now. I'm under the assumption XFS is better in some way, but really don't know

    Comment


    • #3
      Afaik the lore was:
      -XFS was supposed to be better under heavy (server-grade) load, or in crappy devices (it's common in home NAS devices), since it comes from the server space.

      -ext4 is supposed to be better for more daily hardware as it is more resistant to power loss, it does have mature fsck and tooling, and so on.

      There were some horror stories in the (distant) past about systems with XFS that after a power loss while doing things suffered significant data loss, but I think it should have been fixed by now.

      If you look at benches, https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...x-4.4-FS-4-Way
      Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite


      They mostly trade blows. I'd say that it comes down to features or ext4's more "robustness" if it still has that edge on XFS.

      I'm personally on ext4 and will eventually move to btrfs when they implement the raid5-6.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Espionage724 View Post
        Just to drum up a little discussion; is there any point to using ext4 over XFS nowadays? I've been replacing ext4 with XFS for most things for a while now. I'm under the assumption XFS is better in some way, but really don't know
        I think the only real reason could be that you can't shrink a XFS filesystem (you can grow in while mounted though) but you can shrink and grow EXT4. On the other hand file system shrinking is not a frequent use case anyway and if you place a thin LV under XFS then it becomes a non-issue.

        Overall I really like modern XFS - it feels performant and robust as a tank, so I use it for all new systems I set up these days.

        Comment

        Working...
        X