If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
I like how the Wayland releases are now boring. This bodes well for desktop adoption
i dont think there boring. Wayland still isnt 100% complete by any chance AFAIK . i think Wayland 1.12 will go close to being 100% complete though. question is will they get 1.12 in F25 or stay with 1.11
i dont think there boring. Wayland still isnt 100% complete by any chance AFAIK . i think Wayland 1.12 will go close to being 100% complete though. question is will they get 1.12 in F25 or stay with 1.11
Feature parity is not a target for wayland, wayland-protocols, nor for weston. That target is for WMs/DMs that implement wayland.
Additionally, feature partiy with X11 is likely a poor goal, as there are surely some Xorg features that are not desirable, or at least debatable.
Well, technically it should be for Weston for all non-insane X11 functionality as it is the reference compositor. It is also possible Wayland ends up extended to allow DM's to implement things. We'll see
Comment