Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

It's Official: Mesa 13.1 is Now Mesa 17.0

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • It's Official: Mesa 13.1 is Now Mesa 17.0

    Phoronix: It's Official: Mesa 13.1 is Now Mesa 17.0

    There was talk last year of Mesa moving to a date-based version scheme and that's now official with Mesa in Git being 17.0-devel rather than 13.1-devel...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    At first, I was like: "Aw, crap, it's gonna be one of those weird ass decisions again."

    Then, I read the article, and I concluded: that actually sounds logical. Long live Mesa!

    Comment


    • #3
      I wish everything would move to a date-based version scheme. It makes things easier for everyone. If something gets daily updates, just do it based YYMMDD. If something gets updated multiple times a day, just start counting with letters.

      I think the Linux kernel should do this too. The numbering scheme is already completely arbitrary at this point anyway; it pretty much just changes whenever Linus feels like it.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
        I wish everything would move to a date-based version scheme. It makes things easier for everyone. If something gets daily updates, just do it based YYMMDD. If something gets updated multiple times a day, just start counting with letters.

        I think the Linux kernel should do this too. The numbering scheme is already completely arbitrary at this point anyway; it pretty much just changes whenever Linus feels like it.
        I agree so much with this. But there is a problem with this that when an old release gets some fixor backport patch it gets confusing.

        Comment


        • #5
          I like prime numbers: 13, 17, 19, 23 ...

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by cj.wijtmans View Post
            I agree so much with this. But there is a problem with this that when an old release gets some fixor backport patch it gets confusing.
            Aaahhhh.... I wasn't thinking about that.... Good point.

            Comment


            • #7
              And why is the first release 2017 not 17.1?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by mibo View Post
                And why is the first release 2017 not 17.1?
                Why is it not 17.2 since it'll be released in February?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
                  I think the Linux kernel should do this too.
                  "Linux twenty-seventeen-dot-one" sounds awesome, a little like microsoft marketing, but awesome.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    A pity it won't end up in Debian soon because of the freeze. I hope at least it will be uploaded to experimental.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X