Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti On Linux?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti On Linux?

    Phoronix: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti On Linux?

    The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is NVIDIA's new high-end gamer graphics card as a step-up from the previous GTX 1080 flagship. The GTX 1080 Ti is getting ready for release by retailers and, thankfully, NVIDIA did mail out a GeForce GTX 1080 Ti for Linux testing at Phoronix...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Yes, please test on Ryzen and compare with Kaby Lake.
    ## VGA ##
    AMD: X1950XTX, HD3870, HD5870
    Intel: GMA45, HD3000 (Core i5 2500K)

    Comment


    • #3
      Don't test it! Boycott Nvidia so they'll start writing open drivers

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by bug77 View Post
        Don't test it! Boycott Nvidia so they'll start writing open drivers
        Even better option indeed.
        ## VGA ##
        AMD: X1950XTX, HD3870, HD5870
        Intel: GMA45, HD3000 (Core i5 2500K)

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by bug77 View Post
          Don't test it! Boycott Nvidia so they'll start writing open drivers
          Come on! Linux people have so many "hackers" among them. If open drivers were that important, someone would have stolen them already.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by bug77 View Post
            Don't test it! Boycott Nvidia so they'll start writing open drivers
            In other words: The AMD fansquad has already confirmed that Vega won't be that good of a product, so they'd prefer to just pretend that Nvidia doesn't exist.
            Then they'll turn around whine about how "competition is good!" when making yet another argument to buy sub-standard AMD products based on an abstract idea instead of actually rewarding good performance.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by chuckula View Post

              In other words: The AMD fansquad has already confirmed that Vega won't be that good of a product, so they'd prefer to just pretend that Nvidia doesn't exist.
              Then they'll turn around whine about how "competition is good!" when making yet another argument to buy sub-standard AMD products based on an abstract idea instead of actually rewarding good performance.
              There are numerous ways of judging the value of a particular GPU. Although speed and raw performance numbers are by far the most compelling for most people, there are still those of us who find active participation in the development of an open driver tremendously important.

              Edit: wording

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by bwyan View Post

                There are numerous ways of judging the value of a particular GPU. Although speed and raw performance numbers are by far the most compelling for most people, there are still those of us who find active participation in the development of an open driver tremendously important.
                Exactly. I don't say Nvidia cards are not good, you could still make an awesome bottle opener with them. Just don't pretend I will actually use them as video cards because no FOSS drivers means no party for me.
                ## VGA ##
                AMD: X1950XTX, HD3870, HD5870
                Intel: GMA45, HD3000 (Core i5 2500K)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by bwyan View Post

                  There are numerous ways of judging the value of a particular GPU. Although speed and raw performance numbers are by far the most compelling for most people, there are still those of us who find active participation in the development of an open driver tremendously important.

                  Edit: wording
                  Let's not forget "if you want feature X, you need driver Y". That's also valuable to some.
                  But you're right, different people have different priorities.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Personally, I am more interested in more VR results.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X