Intel vs. Radeon vs. NVIDIA OpenGL/Vulkan Linux Driver Performance

[phoronix]

Phoronix: Intel vs. Radeon vs. NVIDIA OpenGL/Vulkan Linux Driver Performance

As another interesting benchmark special for Phoronix's 13th birthday is a comparison of Intel Kabylake, NVIDIA, and Radeon Vulkan vs. OpenGL Linux driver performance. Not only are we looking at the raw OpenGL/Vulkan performance but also the relative performance between graphics APIs on each vendor.

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=24734

[humbug]

So even for Dota2 which has a good openGL implementation the vulkan renderer is now faster when running on the optimized nvidia driver (or amdgpu pro I guess). Will be the same for RadV too soon I suspect..

[edoantonioco]

ssf2017 opengl renderer use GL 2.1, so no wonder why its performance its always bad taking in consideration that it doesnt even match dx9 features.

[schmidtbag]

Thanks for including the CPU utilization results - this is an important metric.

[tildearrow]

Typo:

saw the Intel Vulkan perforance coming up

[onicsis]

Commercial games still have not been full optimized to take the complete advantages the of new Vulkan interface.
In fact, there is a lot of space for improvement both at driver lever, as well as games level.

Major differences between OpenGL and Vulkan are yet to come. At least for AMD.

[fagnerln]

These Vulkan/OGL benchmarks would make more sense if uses AMD CPU (FX or Rysen), the Intel + Nvidia combo can run OGL smoothly.
I've a FX6300, the difference is huge.