Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Redox OS 0.3.3 Released, Lowers RAM Usage

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Redox OS 0.3.3 Released, Lowers RAM Usage

    Phoronix: Redox OS 0.3.3 Released, Lowers RAM Usage

    The Rust-written Redox operating system is out with a new feature release...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    How exactly does a ~40MB OS (judging on the ISO image) end up using 480MB? That sounds absurdly high.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
      How exactly does a ~40MB OS (judging on the ISO image) end up using 480MB? That sounds absurdly high.
      Code:
      #include<stdio.h>
      #include<stdlib.h>
      
      int main(int argc, char **argv){
          int mem_waste = (int*) malloc(1000000000*sizeof(int));
          free(mem_waste);
      
          return 0;
      }
      There. You have a silly program that uses ~4GB of RAM and has a compile size of just a few KB.

      I understand the nature of your question, though.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
        How exactly does a ~40MB OS (judging on the ISO image) end up using 480MB? That sounds absurdly high.
        pre-allocation probably.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
          How exactly does a ~40MB OS (judging on the ISO image) end up using 480MB? That sounds absurdly high.
          It does sound like a lot of bloat. WTF is all that memory used for?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
            How exactly does a ~40MB OS (judging on the ISO image) end up using 480MB? That sounds absurdly high.
            Remember, Redox is a Microkernel based OS. Microkernel's biggest disadvantage (as mentioned by some experts) is exactly that: It would require many more resources to accomplish the same thing as a Monolithic kernel OS would need.

            That's getting better and better everyday, however, as many things are getting their solution...

            we're still not there, but it's becoming more "competitive" everyday

            that's my opinion (Not an expert)

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Mavman View Post

              Remember, Redox is a Microkernel based OS. Microkernel's biggest disadvantage (as mentioned by some experts) is exactly that: It would require many more resources to accomplish the same thing as a Monolithic kernel OS would need.

              That's getting better and better everyday, however, as many things are getting their solution...

              we're still not there, but it's becoming more "competitive" everyday

              that's my opinion (Not an expert)
              Nonsense.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Mavman View Post

                Remember, Redox is a Microkernel based OS. Microkernel's biggest disadvantage (as mentioned by some experts) is exactly that: It would require many more resources to accomplish the same thing as a Monolithic kernel OS would need.

                That's getting better and better everyday, however, as many things are getting their solution...

                we're still not there, but it's becoming more "competitive" everyday

                that's my opinion (Not an expert)
                That kind of BS. QNX is microkernel OS and it's system requirements aren't that high. Minix3 is microkernel and it's requirements aren't high either.
                Redox, NT, BeOS are all hybrid kernels and NT and BeOS requirements are pretty low.
                I don't think Redox high memory usage is just kernel problem.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post
                  How exactly does a ~40MB OS (judging on the ISO image) end up using 480MB? That sounds absurdly high.
                  It may have something to do with the file system with all the software which is kept in RAM in live mode.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by log0 View Post

                    Nonsense.


                    Originally posted by blacknova View Post

                    That kind of BS. QNX is microkernel OS and it's system requirements aren't that high. Minix3 is microkernel and it's requirements aren't high either.
                    Redox, NT, BeOS are all hybrid kernels and NT and BeOS requirements are pretty low.
                    I don't think Redox high memory usage is just kernel problem.
                    Like i said: I'm no expert!!! That's just the idea i got from some readings


                    by the way, blacknova , what makes you say Redox is a hybrid kernel??? I thought it was a MK...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X