Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Xen 4.10 RC1 Now Available For Testing

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Xen 4.10 RC1 Now Available For Testing

    Phoronix: Xen 4.10 RC1 Now Available For Testing

    The first release candidate is now available for the upcoming Xen 4.10 hypervisor update...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    Maybe it's just me, but i think it would be interesting to benchmark this against older verions of VMware, Hyper-V.
    This way we could 'see' if it was worth the change.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by nomadewolf View Post
      Maybe it's just me, but i think it would be interesting to benchmark this against older verions of VMware, Hyper-V.
      This way we could 'see' if it was worth the change.
      As far as I remebber VMWare doesn't allow benchmarks.
      Last time Michael did a Xeon vs. KVM benchmark, KVM was faster, but as far as I remember the gap was later closed by a series of Xen fixes.
      In my experience HyperV on Windows servers is (considerably) slower than them both - especially when it comes to IO.

      - Gilboa
      oVirt-HV1: Intel S2600C0, 2xE5-2658V2, 128GB, 8x2TB, 4x480GB SSD, GTX1080 (to-VM), Dell U3219Q, U2415, U2412M.
      oVirt-HV2: Intel S2400GP2, 2xE5-2448L, 120GB, 8x2TB, 4x480GB SSD, GTX730 (to-VM).
      oVirt-HV3: Gigabyte B85M-HD3, E3-1245V3, 32GB, 4x1TB, 2x480GB SSD, GTX980 (to-VM).
      Devel-2: Asus H110M-K, i5-6500, 16GB, 3x1TB + 128GB-SSD, F33.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by gilboa View Post

        As far as I remebber VMWare doesn't allow benchmarks.
        Last time Michael did a Xeon vs. KVM benchmark, KVM was faster, but as far as I remember the gap was later closed by a series of Xen fixes.
        In my experience HyperV on Windows servers is (considerably) slower than them both - especially when it comes to IO.

        - Gilboa
        Thanks for the input.
        IO is actually my problem with HyperV!...
        I'll try to make some time to test myself and see if it's worth it.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by nomadewolf View Post

          Thanks for the input.
          IO is actually my problem with HyperV!...
          I'll try to make some time to test myself and see if it's worth it.
          N/P.

          - Gilboa
          oVirt-HV1: Intel S2600C0, 2xE5-2658V2, 128GB, 8x2TB, 4x480GB SSD, GTX1080 (to-VM), Dell U3219Q, U2415, U2412M.
          oVirt-HV2: Intel S2400GP2, 2xE5-2448L, 120GB, 8x2TB, 4x480GB SSD, GTX730 (to-VM).
          oVirt-HV3: Gigabyte B85M-HD3, E3-1245V3, 32GB, 4x1TB, 2x480GB SSD, GTX980 (to-VM).
          Devel-2: Asus H110M-K, i5-6500, 16GB, 3x1TB + 128GB-SSD, F33.

          Comment

          Working...
          X