wget https://a248.e.akamai.net/f/674/9206...x86.x86_64.run
works.
very, very slowly ....
Printable View
wget https://a248.e.akamai.net/f/674/9206...x86.x86_64.run
works.
very, very slowly ....
Do you have a changelog? I wonder what the improvements are.Quote:
Originally Posted by energyman
not yet, no. The release notes are always uploaded a bit later in my experience. I don't think they will be available in the next 12-24h
but the driver package is a lot bigger than previous ones. 89mb instead of 85mb of 9.5 or 83 of 9.4, 81 of 9.3, 80 of 9.2, 79 of 9.1
hehe beat me to it, but I can't compile it yet due to the same errors from 9.5 not building on kernel 2.6.29Quote:
Originally Posted by energyman
EDIT: The 2.6.29 patch still applies "cleanly".
EDIT2:yay!Quote:
GL_VERTEX_SHADER_ARB:
GL_MAX_VERTEX_UNIFORM_COMPONENTS_ARB = 1024
GL_MAX_VARYING_FLOATS_ARB = 64
GL_MAX_VERTEX_ATTRIBS_ARB = 16
GL_MAX_TEXTURE_IMAGE_UNITS_ARB = 16
GL_MAX_VERTEX_TEXTURE_IMAGE_UNITS_ARB = 16
GL_MAX_COMBINED_TEXTURE_IMAGE_UNITS_ARB = 16
GL_MAX_TEXTURE_COORDS_ARB = 16
GL_FRAGMENT_SHADER_ARB:
GL_MAX_FRAGMENT_UNIFORM_COMPONENTS_ARB = 1024
GL_MAX_TEXTURE_COORDS_ARB = 16
GL_MAX_TEXTURE_IMAGE_UNITS_ARB = 16
no 2.6.29? oh man - that sucks. Really. It does.Quote:
Originally Posted by hpestilence
release notes are out.
Just so you understand why we aren't spending all our time on the newest kernels, we have a number of workstation customers running on RHEL 4.7 which AFAIK uses a modified 2.6.9 kernel. No that is not a typo. Yes we have to support it.Quote:
Originally Posted by energyman
What does that have to do with 2.6.29 and 2.6.30 which have been i rc for a few weeks. If Nvidia can do it so can AMD.Quote:
Originally Posted by bridgman
What bridgeman is saying is that their dev team is inferior I think...Quote:
Originally Posted by egon2003
(nothing like a little banter to get some devs going...)
I mean come on 2.6.29 isn't even current now.
And we don't care if you have to support guys on RHEL 4.7. Thats your stupid agreements you made with them. Now aren't AMD at the forefront of technology? Or at least supposed to be?
Well there was me hoping I could use the new driver, looks like i'll stick with the radeon driver instead