Radeon Gallium on ubuntu

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jrch2k8

i got it to work up to here
OpenGL vendor string: X.Org R300 Project
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on RS690
OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 7.8-devel
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20

but if i tri to run glxgears for example i got this

glxgears[5714]: segfault at 45c ip 00007fdc86543525 sp 00007ffff91cb060 error 4 in radeong_dri.so[7fdc8651d000+22f000]

what can i do?

---

Producing a useful back-trace via gdb would be the most important thing. Looks like you're using a 64 bit system, I don't know if any of the developers is testing this on 64 bit (I'm certainly not). So it might be a rather simple thing that you can fix yourself and provide a patch for.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nhaehnle

Producing a useful back-trace via gdb would be the most important thing. Looks like you're using a 64 bit system, I don't know if any of the developers is testing this on 64 bit (I'm certainly not). So it might be a rather simple thing that you can fix yourself and provide a patch for.

---

yep 64 bits FTW!! ;)

this is all i could get from gdb

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
r300_update_derived_shader_state (r300=0x6152c0) at /usr/include/bits/string3.h:52
52 return __builtin___memcpy_chk (__dest, __src, __len, __bos0 (__dest));

I'm using 64 bit so it is probably RS690-specific

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EmbraceUnity

Your gallium is reporting as 0.3... do a git pull to update to the latest mesa

---

I update the code daily. But unfortunately no luck.

IIRC, gallium is currently broken on cards without vertex shaders like your RS690.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by agd5f

IIRC, gallium is currently broken on cards without vertex shaders like your RS690.

---

that explain it XD

Just my 2 cents:

radeon driver works for me, but its performance isn't as half as with classic driver.

Quote:

---

OpenGL vendor string: DRI R300 Project
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R300 (RV350 4152) 20090101 x86/MMX/SSE2 TCL DRI2
OpenGL version string: 1.5 Mesa 7.8-devel

glxgears
7116 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1423.112 FPS
7295 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1458.875 FPS
7301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1460.139 FPS
7434 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1486.580 FPS

---

Quote:

---

OpenGL vendor string: X.Org R300 Project
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on RV350
OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 7.8-devel
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20

glxgears
3490 frames in 5.0 seconds = 697.942 FPS
3452 frames in 5.0 seconds = 690.341 FPS
3549 frames in 5.0 seconds = 709.742 FPS
3468 frames in 5.0 seconds = 693.542 FPS
3484 frames in 5.0 seconds = 696.742 FPS

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by pejakm

Just my 2 cents:

radeon driver works for me, but its performance isn't as half as with classic driver.

---

glxgears is not a benchmark... And no, better/faster OpenGL implementations needn't neccessarily be faster in glxgears as well. Try some real 3d application as a benchmark.

Well, that's not to say the G3D driver should be faster for other applications - but might. It wouldn't surprise me if it isn't though since the driver barely is optimized, yet.
(damn 1 minute edit limit)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NeoBrain

glxgears is not a benchmark... And no, better/faster OpenGL implementations needn't neccessarily be faster in glxgears as well. Try some real 3d application as a benchmark.

---

Tried, and it's pretty much the same: with radeong I get half of the FPS I get with classic driver, playing Counter Strike.