Freenet 1406 is out.
Freenet 1406 is out.
Freenet has always been interesting to me. A distributed filesystem on the internet. Top notch encryption. Strong anonymity.
While Freenet 7.5 has been out for a while, todayís build 1406 is notable for one major reason. It is the first release by someone other than Toad (at least from recollection). While this typically wouldnít be considered a major change for any other OSS project, it likely indicates that the speed at which Freenet plugins and supporting applications will increase. Some of the changes in 1406 appear to be directly related to facilitating plugins.
For those of you that have never heard of Freenet, itís a distributed, encrypted, resilient, and anonymous filesystem that is able to serve as an opennet (everyone can connect) or a darknet (only connect to trusted nodes). The network supports plugins which facilitate chat clients, web sites, message boards, and insertion/retrieval of binary files.
*Anonymous (nobody can tell that youíre running Freenet)
*Encrypted (nobody can tell what youíre sending/receiving on Freenet, even if they access your HDD)
*Relatively hard to attack (statistical attacks exist).
*Itís slow. I typically see 1mbit with 3mbit peaks.
*Itís slow. High latency when you click a link, in excess of 10 seconds.
*Itís completely uncensored. While this also fits into the ďGoodĒ category, itís inevitable that you will eventually be directed to a flog, post, or Freesite that you wish you had not happened upon. It is also troubling to some to know that parts of the objectionable content may reside, in encrypted form, in your nodes datastore regardless of whether or not you have browsed to the objectionable content.
*It is difficult to set up a number of the add-on applications (Frost, for example, requires the Oracle JRE, which is no longer a single-click installation in most linux distributions)
Iím honestly looking forward to seeing where Freenet goes in the next few years.
I would be interested in hearing the counterpoints and opinions of other forum members.
The only thing I have against it is it being in Java...
I disagree with your statement as it applies to the core of Freenet. Java makes a nice headless server, has a number of well-tested classes, and has a nice development flow.
Originally Posted by curaga
I completely agree with your statement as it applies to the add-on applications that use a GUI.
The moment a user needs to touch java in any way, either through a swing based GUI or changing CLI args, the user experience goes into the shitter. It's really horrible.