Printable View
Phoronix: X/Wayland Is Coming Along Nicely, But Work Is Left
Keith Packard spoke on Wednesday of the 2012 Linux Foundation Collaboration concerning Wayland and its backwards compatibility support for X applications...
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTA4MzA
It will provide a more direct path to the rendering hardware instead of having to go through X. it just opens a display and puts up a GL context and pushes frames (i think)
Can't wait for Wayland.
Finally, a graphics stack that doesn't suck.
actually most problems with video in linux are not inherently because of x.org. they are because the driver's suck. but yeah, I want to go into time and see when linux desktop has a mature audio/video stack.
Will wayland be FULLY backward-compatibile with X11, a drop-in replacement, or should we rather expect some degree of compatibility with well-behaved applications unless they rely on API x or depend on some behaviour of API y?
I'm not a big fan of the throwing out of babies with the bath water that sometimes happens in the open source world.
"legacy" applications will just run on the xserver which will run as a wayland client.Quote:
Originally Posted by peppepz
I'm a bit disappointed that Michael - a self proclaimed open source advocate - has an Iphone
Wait just a second. Did you say iPhone?
Damn. If there was something to make sure even less people want Wayland it's making it depend on systemd.
He also has news about Unigine, Valve, and a boatload of other proprietary software.Quote:
Originally Posted by FireBurn
Open Source advocates generally prefer whatever software does the best job, believing that Open development processes produce better software. The iOS hardware and OS still beat the Android OS (which is also not fully Free) and other OSes hands-down (a bit subjective, yes, I admit), so even if Open Source is better in general, in the specific case of phone OSes the proprietary iOS may (again, somewhat subjectively) still be the better choice for real-world products.