All of this seems like minor trolling compared to the worst I've seen here.
I remember a user going on about how the jews framed Hans Reiser.
Here's an idea: bsd, linux, mac, and windows users and developers are actually people, have a life, and need to get things done. Their choice of operating system has something to do with that need, and nothing to do with religion or politics, and they could (and probably do) care less about your worthless squabbles about which license is better.
Here's another: Both GPL and BSD style licenses promote freedom, but each a different kind of freedom. Both kinds of freedom are useful and needed in order for society (as it is today) to function. If you want to make GPL become used wide-spread or stop BSD from being "abused" by companies, you should start by talking with companies and law-makers instead of arguing with your fellow free and open source software friends.
I, for one, have never been punched by a BSD user because I contribute to GPL software, or vice versa. Maybe it's because they have more sense than any of the number of trolls you'll find on the internet put together. Take that how you will.
Lampshade Hanging now, are we? Welcome to the trollective conciousness.
So debunking outright lies and slander about BSD makes me a troll. Wow, that actually tells more about you than me.Quote:
The root of the problem are trolls, which get responce from other people. Like BSD trolls. You are BSD troll by the way, hence your opinion is biased.
Here you can see where the actual problem lies, the member you are speaking of is not Cthulhux, but CthuIhux, may be you didn't get that these are not the same becasue the troll was successful with his tactics.Quote:
Somebody decided to battle them with same weapon, hence appearance of systemd, cthulhux etc. They are response to the problem in form of another problem.
This is not about shoot at sight. CthuIhux was already banned, he was already convicted and banned, but you seem not to get that. By the way, the only one here who mentioned a specific type of government, more specifically a dictator, was you, I just described how things in a constitutional state are handled. Funny that you can differentiate between those two.Quote:
Exactly, think before writing, follow your own advice. There are many goverment types, those you mentioned is extremely totalitarian and you know what happend to it after war ended and they had no enemy, and hence no bold vector of good/bad to attach crowd to. You are not putting people in prison. Ban means shoot on site; and your own method is similar to Stalin.
This wasn't even quoted from you.Quote:
Nice pure troll attempt to push me into offtopic
Who cares if it is debunked anyways.Quote:
Instead, you get response below in form of static data which I will not comment or respond to.
This was a comment about the quality of his post. If you feel offended by that feel free to report me to a moderator for that, this forum (believe it or not) actually has a function for that.Quote:
I also highlightened the personal attack, which supports my case of "banning every single BSD troll" (but not BSD user).
BSD does not allow you to violate their license, so that BSD allows anything is in fact wrong.Quote:
Whore allows everything for money. Definition of BSD. You think its bad, but in fact its neutral - its state of things.
So you don't use shadow or Xorg on your systems? Or are you supporting those whores nonetheless, only in your finer house build on Linux? Double standard anyone?Quote:
Hence I don't use BSD(M)
Unless you can show me specifically where I attacked the GPL I take it that this is an outright lie.Quote:
Instead of covering your falling off "we are open(until we want it so)" camouflage, you begin to attack GPL. Huge mistake, because you point yourself out as freedom hater in disguise.
Because stating that the BSD license is shit, but using BSD licensed software nonetheless is nothing more than showing that the BSD haters are hypocrites. The Linux systems that make them feel so superior wouldn't work without BSD licensed software.Quote:
You suggest me to use GPL-only. Why?
The difference is that I am not bitching against the GPL any time a news comes up that mentions GPL licensed software.Quote:
If you would use BSD-only, then your BSD would stop existing 10 years ago. Sure, I am vectored at strong copyleft license for a open and clear reason, and I will switch to software that supports the case if it becomes available. I also support GPL so the software with right goal develops. But if its not available, I use what I have; you must excuse me for not following your own lifestyle of living in a cave and "posting bullshit" with a hammer on walls.
In short, you are much more behaving like a troll, sadly not one of great quality, like former trolls here.
No one is denying that. I wonder why you BSD haters always think that someone who isn't a BSD hater automatically must be a GPL hater?Quote:
GPL has preserved the freedom of countless numbers of developers, users and software and it has spawned businesses based on free and open source software and millions of high quality, reliable free and open software freely downloadable from the internet with low or no cost and with no DRMs and BDSM user agreements.
This bullshit isn't even worth a comment.Quote:
1. BSD is responsible for Apple's rise and behaviour
2. BSD is responsible for Microsoft rise and behaviour (They gave their TCP/IP)
3. BSD is responsible for DRMs
4. BSD is responsible for binary blobs
5. BSD is responsible for Windows 8
6. BSD is responsible for lack of drivers in Linux
7. BSD is responsible for UEFI restricted booting
8. BSD is responsible for millions under bondage to M$ and Apple
9. BSD is responsible for the problems faced by free and open source projects
10. BSD is responsible for holding back free and open source projects
11. BSD is responsible for todays proprietary software
Repeating a lie doesn't make it true.Quote:
Let me repeat,
I understand that without a problem. Your real problem lies here:Quote:
Look at the BSD license, if you place a modification that is GPL or proprietary on BSD licensed code, it becomes GPL or proprietary. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEAD.
You are to dumb to understand that putting BSD licensed code into a GPL project does not change the license for it at all. Only the copyright holder can change the license, not some random developer that puts that code into some random project. That actually is the problem for BSD licensed projects, they can't use GPL licensed code in their projects.Quote:
There are formally BSD licensed code in the GNU tools but GNU licensed modifications have been added which make the entire code GPL (absolutely no BSD)
So basically you have shown here that you don't even understand the simple BSD licenses, which actually makes all your posts about licenses void of any relevant information, together with your conclusions from your irrelevant "information".