Search:

Learn the basics, kid.

So is FreeBSD.

That's why Linux applications run faster on BSD.

Actually no. I linked the laughable Debian donors list above.

Actually, Windows is ok. It just lacks preinstalled GNU/BSD tools like sed.

Hmm. Well, yes. So which Linux distribution lives without "proprietary company's" donations? Even Debian fails.

http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/sponsors.shtml

Also, (actually) FreeBSD does not really have much manpower.

And why should we as users care about the market?

1. You mix up Linux with some of its distributions. To be fair, you should consider comparing it with PC-BSD.

2. You mix up UFS with UFS2.

Nice try though.

Same applies to a couple of Linux distributions. So what do you use then? Windows? Or does Windows already overburden you? Hmm, OS X then? Oh, no, it's based on BSD...

Now this may explain something.

Why not PC-BSD? :)

Go away, Linsux fanboy.

Oh look, our Linsux loser kid has a new name, trying to mock those who can't read too well.

Anyway:



Have you ever worked with apt-get?
If so, you would know that pkg can do much more. It...

Linux Mint and LMDE are not the same system. LMDE is a Debian-based distribution, Linux Mint is Ubuntu-based. Like CentOS is not Fedora.

And it features preconfigured pkgng repositories. Finally, the "apt" clone ;) works like a charm!

Well, how do they say? "Open source is more secure because more people can see what's going on". Hahaha. Great.

[ ] you know the difference

"Working" and "released" are different. I am pretty sure the current E18 state is working too.

Yay. Only 10 more years for the beta.