Search:

i'm rather interested in the presentation handouts/files. could you provide them downloadable as pdf? (imho they are more intersting than watching a looong video...)

yeah great :)

a possible bug (just recognized via screenshot, perhaps isn't one...):
seeems like there are problems with detecting the xorg-driver (or at least presenting it via the webinterface). see here...

just as i already pointed it out in another tread (http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?p=80829#post80829).
very nice, anyway :)

omg ubuntu again...slower than 9.04...9.04 was horrible, it's a *really* heavy regression...intel 2.8 works perfectly with other distri...what do they at canoncial??...how incompetent can they be??!...

one more tester ;) ..... i want one pls, too! thanks michael for all your engagement!!!

nice! happy to hear that! one question: i'm running arch 32bit (2.6.30) on my netbook. of course, i'm already on driver version 2.7.999. 2.8 should be in there today or tomorrow. how can i find out...

as i already pointed out in another thread, intel seems to open up the pulsbo driver in q4 in 2009

well, that's nvidia's fault! their problem. perhaps sometimes they realize that they *have* to give out docs and open their driver (hehe hope for more pressure for chrome os).

OT:
Am I the only one who read the blog entry and found that: "The Poulsbo (US15W) video driver may be Open Source'd by Q4 2009"??

well that's even better!

Hi,
i wonder whether there are any public api specs for phoronix global. if not, do you plan to release them? so that other programs can parse phoronix global results etc.

greets

see my propose in the for a phoronix wiki with a center on graphic (and on audio, if you wish)
http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16155

well, the *stucture* of such a wiki is another thing to think about (also to have a central point to explain graphic apis such as openvg, opencl, vdapu, xv; drm/dri, mesa (link to all mesa-related...

hm llvm itself is already optimized for shaders i thought. at least apple uses it for their shader optimizations, too.

Hi everyone (especially michael),

lots of things happen in the linux graphic world. it is very hard to understand and to get information about the whole process. x.org wiki doesn't have many...

ok, so this doesn't have to do anything with a gallium3d-driver (aka drm-driver?), does it? omg so difficult :/
hm i'm going to request a phoronix wiki where we could add information just like these...

hm and fglrx's move to gallium3d? are there already plans? do you already have a strategy how/when to do this? it's going to be difficult to share code, isn't it? perhaps than, the time for a full...

well, if someone tunes let's say the opengl-implementation in mesa or the state tracker (don't know whether i'm right, mean opnecl-, openvg-, 2d-modul in gallium3d on top of the pipe driver), than...

benches!!111!!1! :)
however, i wonder why tuning the different pipes, mesa and (intel is going to do this) shouldn't help to improve radeon's gallium3d-performance.

ok. so what's the decission? a hick-hack. is ttm going away and gem is going to get ttm-like features? or does ttm "survive", gets in the kernel for ati, via, s3, nvidia perhaps etc.beside from gem??...