Thank you, I do.
And yet you got to play for over two years for that $30. Just pretend they shut the server down instead of going free to play.
Gold shield, some free alt I believe,...
Type: Posts; User: KameZero; Keyword(s):
Thank you, I do.
And yet you got to play for over two years for that $30. Just pretend they shut the server down instead of going free to play.
Gold shield, some free alt I believe,...
Already, I guess I'll stop being lazy.
Yes, I do remember this, and there's something you apparently somehow never understood: People who go on the forums ARE THE VAST MINORITY. The only time...
Hmm, downtime that was, what almost two years ago at this point and a bug that lasted a few hours? Yeah, I'm sure your average user REALLY cares.
95% of users don't care about ANY of this. They care about one thing: Is the game fun?
And on that metric I would hardily recommend it.
/eyeroll
10char
This is a common misconception. Many game devs CHOOSE to do this, but valve does not MAKE them. Some game devs choose for their games to not have any drm on steam, valve merely offers the game devs...
Wrong on both counts, actually. Nvidia's licence specifically says:
And nowhere in the GPL does it state that you are not allowed to include a closed kernel module when shipping to a...
What? Of course you can.
Not gonna lie, I lol'd for like ten minutes.
And? Despite what you seem to think, there will ALWAYS be indie devs who will be willing to let HBI port their games to get into a bundle. All HBI has to do is say they will not do you a bundle...
Indeed, I was considering this. If done properly (and assuming the bundle rakes in a lot of cash), HBI could use this as a good leveraging tool to get AAA games to port (or let HBI port them) for the...
They don't. That's why they aren't allowed in the courts of nearly every country in the world.
Very nice. Anyone who was having issues previously tried the latest patch?
The Mac port was done by Aspyr, a third party company who pays studios to be able to make mac ports, basically Loki. So, until we get another Loki who can manage to be as successful as Aspyr, I'ma go...
"We will be using a sign up page for the external beta."
So... not already chosen :p
It's not really "from the start" if it's 1.6 million dollars later :p
Those packages seem to be done by Ubuntu themselves(or someone from the HIB, hard to say). But neither Runic nor Edmund creates the .deb for the USC.
He also says that this is a REGRESSION of the latest git version (read: not thoroughly tested or used in production) and that it ran just peachy at 60 FPS before. So I fail to see what this has to do...
Really? Do we have any benchmarks for mono Windows vs mono Linux?
Odd, I get 60 FPS no problem on a 460.