hehehe :D one of the best comments on this forum ever.. It seems amd/ati did its thing again serving a canned horseshit full of bugs pretending to be a driver.. Well ati user folks.. The best thing...
Type: Posts; User: barbarbaron; Keyword(s):
hehehe :D one of the best comments on this forum ever.. It seems amd/ati did its thing again serving a canned horseshit full of bugs pretending to be a driver.. Well ati user folks.. The best thing...
Very nice! :) It gives hope to me about my GeForce G110M's support in the future :))
Intel rocks here on a GM45 with latest libdrm, mesa, intel ddx updates. Two thumbs up!
OK maybe not that much for me but they really do some great games.
As an ex-X1950XT user I don't recommend you ati cards unless you wanna use winblowz. ati dropped its support so soon for R100-R500 (in 2009) and many users found themselves out in the open. And ati...
ooops I said trivial for the drivers? its meant for the hardware..
I don't think that the investment on the driver side can be that much for a giant semiconductor company. Because I think patching an already "working" fglrx driver for a new kernel and X mustn't be a...
I totally agree. Its a chicken egg problem. Maybe this type of revolutions can make amd/ati planners think "hmm, something is happening in the linux side, maybe we should change our policy and give...
Tell this to amd/ati guys. They are the obstacle between us linux users and an active linux gaming.
Well yes its true that intel hardware is behind nv or ati in terms of performance, but: Its NOT as expensive as their products and consumes less TDP making battery life longer. And for the opensource...
Hehehe :D You can't understand anything straight? I'm talking about ATI closed source drivers. I'm using intel's opensource stack on my laptop anyway and I'm quite happy with it. See my post here ATI...
Oh and I almost forgot:
THANK YOU INTEL!
After all this discussion:
I'm still thinking the future of ATI->linux drivers will be crap :D :D
Hmm thanks people, very informative! So the G45 architecture is the same as i965? Maybe wrong but I think its a very old model.
To everyone except Q!!
OK not the 4.0 but can it theoretically :D do OpenGL 3.x? And what's the roadmap to OGL 3.x in mesa? Thanks to everyone.
except Q!!
Well well well.. It will be an interesting benchmark: DX11 Tesselation vs OGL4 tesselation.. Linux OGL4 vs Win7 OGL4 etc.
Hehe good one! :D
Making affordable pieces of hardware that consume less TDP and make battery lives longer and making them useful in ALL platforms by supporting them driver-wise and not leaving driver development to...
Yes it would be interesting, count me in :)
As I mentioned in a previous post, (http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?t=23068) I've seen concrete performance differences between Win7 home basic (stock OS of my laptop) and ubuntu lucid...