Search:

I was not happy about their high bandwidth usage not for your own messages, not to mention the proprietary protocol underneath.

Their paid services could be even worse, I once had to call paypal...

wicd is easy to use, while nm is a little bit too clever for me.

now, I can use sun-jre-bin plugin in epiphany (2.0 firefox)

and icedtea6 for firefox-3.0

too bad, icedtea6 doesn't work in firefox-2.0, and sun-jre-bin doesn't firefox-3

the 2.6.25 issue being fixed in mesa/drm -git

with 2.6.26, the screen goes blank when startx, and a reboot is required before I could see anything on screen

now, drm module won't load with 2.6.25

is the open source support being downgraded...

core 2 duo T2400 (T60)

but T2400 is not "core 2 duo", better comparison should be with core 2 duo T7200 (T60)

gnash plays youtube well right now, but still need better support for swf8/9.

couple of weeks?

the first problem is a really trouble for me. it freezes from time to time not only for 5 seconds, but 5+ mins, or even 30 mins! the cursor still moves, but firefox would freeze. as far as I'm aware...

say, lenovo wants to make it linux compatible also without much additional efforts to bring in 5% more customers. then, lenovo switches to nvidia.

it doesn't cost much to switch, so it worthwhile...

I don't even want any hardware with built-in DRM support.

all the discussion makes it clear to me, go Intel for video.

my old intel i830 onboard video can play aiglx well, while my much later...

on t60p, it's basically smooth. The worst thing is of course the ATI video card, it's just hopeless. I know well that AMD (and phoronix) experts may tell me how promising AMD's new codebase driver...

also try xf86-video-ati, which has drm support already (requires git version mesa/drm r500-support branch)

video play back works for me, with radeonhd or the radeon driver. just no xvideo support....

their releasing cycle, their random version numbers

so, it's more than just making fun of users

there will be no superior fglrx :)

if there's a chance to mess it up, fglrx developers won't miss it.

they are good at keeping releasing cycles, making fun of users, but not developing drivers....

the git version ebuild has been in the x11 overlay for long.

don't get caught by amd propaganda again.

also, amd boasts how fast their new "real" quad-core processors are.

the fact is barcelona runs super-pi 1M in 30s, while core 2 duo runs 1M in half...

amd/ati is very successful in turning patient customers emotional

while their fglrx (aha, renamed now) have driven enough number of linux users away.

The shitty GPU driver would hurt their CPU business for sure.

at least, I have no interest in amd cpu any...

they came up with the cheap idea, renaming fglrx.

AMD treats customers as brainless.

Please, AMD, we asked for firing of fglrx developers. Cheap tricks won't do it.

Anyway, I have to make...