Is that there will be a fine graned code review!
Adding backdoors to kernel krypto would make Linux a dream OS for a lot of people out there!
Type: Posts; User: Uqbar; Keyword(s):
Is that there will be a fine graned code review!
Adding backdoors to kernel krypto would make Linux a dream OS for a lot of people out there!
What happened to the plain old English?
Is everyone quitting the school before being 7?
(From linked document, slide #3).
WRONG: Complaints mean that you're project is in use!
RIGHT: Complaints...
There's no official spin any more now. There's actually no spin at all.
LXDE, KDE, GNOME and XFCE are all "external projects" to Ubuntu now. There's no Canonical direct involvement any more (but the...
While in the past ... they were doing it in person.
So the announcement is: Canonical is not even doing the GNOME distro any more. And they already kicked the KDE distro 1 year ago.
This doesn't...
and innovation from Canonical!
C'mon, guys! You are focusing too much on the fluff.
Please, bring first the distribution to an almost-zarro-bugs state. And then spend your time in official color...
I would say so. That's what happens.
The other option is to boot with another bootable medium and try to see what happened... but the boot errors will be gone, then. As there's no booted...
Yeah! System administration is not the same as normal user activities. And when the going gets tough, the tough gets going. We need the plain old kernel consoles. Being that on local console (aka...
I think about all those cases when the system is not fully booted. I use to get a few cases a year (on a dozen of test servers). I go to the server room, I switch the console and see. I usually do...
If you use non-7BIT-ASCII for your system configuration files, then you are right.
I run a number of Linux servers. I have UTF-8 for both contents and file names. But only for user related suff....
Correct, but then you need extra hardware (a PC and/or a console server and/or a serial adapter) in order to troubleshoot a boot process! Serial consoles are quite useful, indeed. Still I don't see...
And I admit I could be badly wrong.
So I need some hints to lower my stupidity.
Zeroth question: what's a kernel console for?
It serves mainly to two purposes. To provide some booting...
I don't dare to install beta stuff on my PC as it's daily production.
But from the numbers shown in the main article, I would not say KDE v4.9 is better than v4.8.
At the best it is a little...
Apart the "broken ports", I would say the other points are "pros" to me to use AnyBSD!
I would not trash an OS because it doesn't have (YET) userland stuff to handle MAPI, ISDN or any other...
No, it's just you and another half billion users.
WattOS should be aimed to productivity workstation under normal usage.
How can OpenArena, H.264 video encoding, gfx rendering, OpenSSL, Apache and password cracking fit this profile?
Your ideas...
That Linux is 19 years behind Windows!
+1. But what about fixes? Would you prefer to wait until next release?
IMHO, "release it when it's ready" is OK as far as bug fixes first go to the current one and only later to the next one....
Which one?
Those OSes have a major pro. They are an OS *and* a distribution.
This means that the kernel itself is shipped along with a (rather) complete operating environment.
Everything is under control....
Ubuntu development team has proven in the time not to be able to cope with real development, software integration and bug fixing.
The Ubuntu people have one thing in mind: profit opportunities....