Search:

Thanks for the link,

though i don't understand the results to be fair :p

Is that a comparison between lz4 & lzo ?
If yes, why then is there one config called "btrfs-lzo-lz4"
and the other one...

Any upcoming benchmark with transparent FS compression on Phoronix ?

Great work drgr33n !!

Clear and detailed results !

Is there any way to make these "comparable", say with non-compressed & gzip-compressed settings for example ?

> I wrote a patch so people can benchmark with linux 3.2

Great ! Thanks !

By the way, when will Phoronix publish its updated BTRFS benchmarks, as said in the article ?

Well, it seems there is an even better alternative than Snappy which is being tested by LessFS :

http://www.lessfs.com/wordpress/?p=688

When will we have an article about that on Phoronix ?

Since you are evaluating better alternatives to LZO,
you may also have a look to LZ4.

It's apparently faster than Snappy,
while being a plug&play replacement, according to the Apache team which...