Search:

Arrogant why???? half the most in the threads are misinformations, worst than mine.


Really... Really... so you said that qt is not Qt too. omg.


I know that, thats why I said Cannonical...

There is a lot of drama in this thread about KDE, Kwin, etc that make me laugh. It's incredible how people don't pay attention to the details.

1. Like someone said, KDE will not even consider a...

Looking at dates, looks the other way around. Apparently his stay on Gnome was a short one :)

But unless he explain, I guess he's just checking the current status of the mayor DE's.

If you are talking about GUI toolkits, technically there are two: GTK and QT. Most desktops/windows managers out there use one or the other. There are also shell environmental variables which...

As a programmer (but not kernel programmer btw), I think Linux distributions needs some things to get broader user and corporate (development) audience. At the moment I can think of:

1. An...

The Wiki article mentions it.

You can try Arch. The only mayor shortcoming it had was the lack of package signing, but not anymore. While some people might argue about the occasional breakage rolling can bring, installing a...

*
Not much old, KDE 3.5.10, which was released in August 2008. Nearly 4 years, but no, is not old.

They don't even pickup Trinity which offers a fixed version of 3.5.x series (currently 3.5.13)....

If you use Arch, then you have no idea at all how it works (or pacman). Also you cannot rule Linux distributions by looking at how only one distribution do things.

1. Arch packages may look...

AMD is having problems with the Windows driver too. Previously they had a record of releasing a driver each month and Cat 12.2 was MIA in February, except for a "Pre-release" that can be found on a...

Linux is not the only one affected. For a company with a track record of releasing a driver each month for a couple of years now, where was the official 12.2 Windows driver in February. I know...

libraries and frameworks which probably don't work straight out of the box with Mono, again proving my point. If only Microsoft made C# right from the start. Nehhh is Microsoft, you can't ask...

I saw people commented on things like performance of C# against X language, or difference in syntax or garbage collection logic. But things can be more easier and simpler to look from another...

There is a small detail no one mention earlier. In case you don't know a 32-bit system (or game) is limited to 4 GB of memory. On a 64-bit system you may have the game and other software working...