I was asked to repeat same tests with UFS, so here they are.
First I just run the same benchmarks over UFS. Here are the results:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/TEST.ata.ufs...
Type: Posts; User: mav@; Keyword(s):
Some numbers about UFS
I was asked to repeat same tests with UFS, so here they are.
First I just run the same benchmarks over UFS. Here are the results:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/TEST.ata.ufs...
Some alternative benchmarks
To additionally ground my point here is some of my benchmark results. It was done on i386 9-CURRENT with 2GB RAM. Such memory-limited condition was chosen intentionally to minimize cache effects and...
Let me comment the results.
Sorry for the late response, I have just noticed this thread. I believe some results of this tests set are incorrect. I would like to comment them.
First 9 results look fine:
1. LZMA Compression...
It would be nice if in future I/O-related FreeBSD...
It would be nice if in future I/O-related FreeBSD tests you've compared new CAM-based ATA infrastructure. It first appeared in FreeBSD 8.0 and becoming mature enough now in 8.1. Due to added NCQ...