Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 46

Thread: NVIDIA 173.14.05 Display Driver

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Same as Murphy, and on the desktop, I only ever bought NVidia following 3DFX's demise (and I didn't even abandon them during the FX series ...) I'll be buying ATI for a while (with no second though, as the upcoming GTX series seems way to extreme for me anyway), and the reason why is just sad. Oh well ...

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,587

    Default

    People.....

    GLXGEARS IS NOT A BENCHMARK!!!

    It can be used to verify that hardware-accelerated libraries are installed correctly, but that's about it.

    You want to benchmark it, then use realworld benchmarks. I recently read about a site that happens to be doing a benchmark suite for linux. If I could only find a link to that site.......

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    134

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marakaid View Post
    Strange driver:
    "X Server Display Configuration" does not work on NVIDIA X Server Settings.
    This is what I meant.

    glxgears is about 15000+ FPS, on 169.12 is 21300+ FPS !
    I get around 13000 with this version on a 7800 GTX

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    People.....

    GLXGEARS IS NOT A BENCHMARK!!!

    It can be used to verify that hardware-accelerated libraries are installed correctly, but that's about it.

    You want to benchmark it, then use realworld benchmarks. I recently read about a site that happens to be doing a benchmark suite for linux. If I could only find a link to that site.......
    To be honest, as a programmer, I expext that if a code is better than other, it works faster (in this context). So, yes, glxgears may not be a benchmark and just tries to render three meshed gears but, if the code accelerating it better, it'll yield better frame rates...

    To be more specific, I understand that glxgears just renders 3 objects and a light and uses most basic properties of openGL but this means that glxgears shows the foundation's speed. So if the code yields more frame rates it means most important part of the code, the foundation, has got better. Latest drivers may have more optimized shader compilers or more efficient power management or some nasty memory optimizations and work 3-5 FPS faster in games or whatever...

    This optimizations are useless after some point since the foundation is slower and this is the point. I vote for a completely-better driver. Not a optimized here but broke there code mess.

  5. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by murphy666 View Post
    New release without 2d performance gain for 8xxx series...

    THAT'S ENOUGH!!! I waited since oct2007 to get the real deal... my old MX440 work better that my 8600 card...

    Now i'm going to drill a hole in it to make sure no one can use this #$%!%# card again and I'm going to buy ATI card.
    Having just upgraded my laptop with and ATI card to a Nvidia card this kind of funny to read.

    Before you do anything rash with your hardware have a read of the ATI forum here on Phoronix and notice that others are pulling their hair out over various issues and threatening to burn their ATI and switch to a nvidia.

    Be well aware that both binary drivers have their issues, sometimes major showstoppers depending on your hardware. Both open source efforts (RadeonHD, Noveau) are a little way off completion, although hopefully closing in on "good enough" status rapidly.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    107

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by M1AU View Post
    This is what I meant.



    I get around 13000 with this version on a 7800 GTX
    I am using 8800GT with E6750 on a G33 mainboard.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    21

    Default

    The NVIDIA 173.14.05 does ship with "out of the box" support for the Linux 2.6.25 kernel and preliminary support for X.Org 7.4 / X Server 1.5.
    So it means that nVidia driver will work with Fedora 9?
    If yes, I'm waiting for livna.org package and finally I could update Fedora:)

  8. #18

    Default

    The NEW driver is very fast!
    Wine + Cod4 = 28-40FPS!

    before with 173.08
    Wine + Cod4 = 19-30FPS!
    NVIDIA Thank you!, And request more FPS
    Last edited by osmanovic100; 05-29-2008 at 06:49 AM.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Kongsberg, Norway
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danniello View Post
    So it means that nVidia driver will work with Fedora 9?
    If yes, I'm waiting for livna.org package and finally I could update Fedora
    Yes, it works, though there is some text corruption going on Strangely enough, it only seem to affect some fonts, but not all. I'm not sure if this is my fault or the driver though.

    Here's an example of it

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ltmon View Post
    Having just upgraded my laptop with and ATI card to a Nvidia card this kind of funny to read.

    Before you do anything rash with your hardware have a read of the ATI forum here on Phoronix and notice that others are pulling their hair out over various issues and threatening to burn their ATI and switch to a nvidia.

    Be well aware that both binary drivers have their issues, sometimes major showstoppers depending on your hardware. Both open source efforts (RadeonHD, Noveau) are a little way off completion, although hopefully closing in on "good enough" status rapidly.
    The reason I will switch to ATI is that AMD ARE really working with the community to get open source driver usable in 2d/3d for these card. Sadly "Nouveau" driver is not usable at all for me (I know they are working really hard!) so the reason I will switch to ATI is their open source drivers not the closed one.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •