Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: X.Org 7.2: ATI Open v. Closed Drivers

  1. #1

    Default X.Org 7.2: ATI Open v. Closed Drivers

    Last October we had compared the performance of the open-source R300 display driver against the closed-source fglrx driver for ATI Radeon graphics cards. In that comparison a Mobility Radeon X300 was used with X.Org 7.1, but we have decided to take another look at this driver comparison under X.Org 7.2. In this last comparison, the fglrx binary blob had greatly outperformed the open-source driver. While the fglrx driver remains faster, has the performance delta between these two drivers decreased?
    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=8656

    Digg: http://digg.com/linux_unix/X_Org_7_2...Closed_Drivers
    Last edited by Michael; 02-06-2007 at 03:23 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    PL
    Posts
    910

    Default

    well it's a bit sad, but i'm really considering staying with open drivers nevertheless.

    let's wait for some nouveau vs nvidia blobs comparison :]
    when nouveau gets ready, that is.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    20

    Default

    First we have to look if the fglrx drivers WORK without freezing, and then we can talk about performane

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by giorgosts View Post
    First we have to look if the fglrx drivers WORK without freezing, and then we can talk about performane

    What freezing/stability problems do you have?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default

    I thought they'd be better, but I didn't know flgrx would kick ass that much

    Synergy6

  6. #6

    Default

    ( An Intel v. ATI open-source driver comparison will also be posted later this week. )

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •