Jade, there seems to have been a misunderstanding.
Those benchmarks are meaningful to you and Vighy for different reasons:
You are interested in demonstrating Reiser4's superiority and supporting your allegation that it has been sabotaged. For that purpose, perhaps 2.6.20 is "more than adequate" in that it at least shows a decline.
Vighy, on the other hand, is (like myself) simply curious to see how various filesystems compare in benchmarks, due to some enthusiasm or interest in Linux, filesystem performance, or all of the above. For that purpose, 2.6.20 and 2.6.13 are both ancient history.
Last edited by StringCheesian; 06-19-2008 at 12:36 PM.