Page 13 of 114 FirstFirst ... 311121314152363113 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 1134

Thread: Put the wish list for porting projects HERE...

  1. #121
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thetargos View Post
    Wow is like if they DIDN'T want others licensing their engines, as the license fee is not enough and ask for revenue!
    That's why I kept going on and on in other threads about my position on this subject. I'm not going to get started again on that subject (and would ask people to try to do much the same...) because I'm not gunning for that in this thread/project- nor am I trying to "fix" parts of the very broken scheme of things as they are now by trying to sell things cheaper, etc.

    I may get stoned for this, but it looks like there needs to be a shift in paradigm regarding games, at least. I looks like the traditional model of developer-publisher (which in the end the tendency seems to be publishers owning studios), studios would be better off cutting the man in the middle and selling directly (I know I may be talking foot in mouth), but it does seem as if those responsible selling the games refuse to do so despite how positive towards Linux the studio might be.
    Heh... What do you think part of the objectives is for this thread?

    Grousing about not selling isn't going to fix things.
    Grousing about not advertising isn't going to fix things.
    Grousing about people not getting AAA titles isn't going to fix things.

    Those all require much, much more cash than I think anybody right at the moment in the Linux space can muster appropriately.

    I'm proposing working at trying to change the game- because it's very most definitely gotten taken over, in the large, by the same crowd that's screwed up all that's fubared in the music and movie businesses.

  2. #122
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Mexico City, Mexico
    Posts
    899

    Default

    I just remembered one game I had lots and lots of fun playing. I really enjoyed it and while it runs almost flawless in Wine, a native client, maybe with revamped graphics would be (IMO) awesome. I'm talking about Anachronox, developed by Ion Storm and published by Eidos Interactive. I do believe that Ion Storm was bought by another publisher. And I do not know who might have the source for the game, or if it might be complete.

  3. #123
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    90

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf View Post
    Are you talking 10k users? If you're not, you're not talking large enough numbers for them to CARE. Honest. The money involved catering to a couple thousand doesn't outweigh the expenses involved otherwise.
    Most games are getting Mac ports these days, so the hard work (DX->OpenGL) is already done. As an aside, though, it also boggles me why developers stick with platform dependant APIs (eg. DirectX) for solely this reason. Using cross-platform APIs broadens your target audience significantly for no extra work (and even without explicit ports, such things help the game run better under Wine/Cedega/CrossOver).

    But speaking numbers, Wine's userbase is quite large (some estimates put it around a couple million, IIRC). Not all of it is for gaming of course, but I'd wager a sizeable portion is. TransGaming, who sell Cedega, basically advertises as a gaming-enhanced version of Wine. Codeweavers, who sell CrossOver and help fund Wine development, also does quite well. So, there are quite a few users here a publisher can sell to. But of course, we need a good game.. not many people will buy decade-old ports of games no one has heard of or cared about. The few older games that stand the test of time (eg. Morrowind) will do better, but the fresher a popular game is in the minds of gamers (Oblivion, Prey, etc) the better chances of it getting sold.

  4. #124
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    162

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf View Post
    Please refrain from filling up the thread with mass cut and pastes- a LINK will suffice here.
    Done.

    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf View Post
    I would ask that you try to keep further posts on topic.
    No problem. I answered your post in the first thread, feel free not answering it.

    It would be nice though if you could apply this request to your own comments :

    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf View Post
    I would ask that you try to keep further posts on topic.
    and :
    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf View Post
    Everyone, this is part of WHY LGP can't arrange deals where you talk about "selling it for 'half price'"
    or
    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf View Post
    Grousing about not advertising isn't going to fix things.
    (edit : snipped)
    Those all require much, much more cash than I think anybody right at the moment in the Linux space can muster appropriately.
    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf
    Complaining about not selling isn't going to get you anywhere- because advertising, etc. costs lots of money.
    Because comments like that (disregarding what people have already adressed) are the reasons this topic can go OT, and you're just starting it.

    Edit : keep them comming
    Last edited by miles; 06-30-2008 at 04:30 PM.

  5. #125
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf View Post
    Heh... Both are COOL AAA titles from the looks of things. Ubisoft's not openly hostile to Linux right at the moment- so it's not a foregone conclusion. Unfortunately, the song and dance about AAA titles costing a pretty penny is very, very real and unless you have sales numbers or a LOT of cash, I don't know if these are at all doable.
    Well yeah but the first game is quite old now(2003). It would also probably make a good test for the publisher to see how that will go to maybe look into porting the new game as well.
    BTW what about stardock? or have looked into that already?
    Also Ion Storm ws a subsidiary of Eidos and i suspect it's them that have the rights. Dunno if they have the code though obviously. And since Ion Storm was mentioned. Deus Ex would be cool(wasn't Loki making this before they folded?)

  6. #126
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Most games are getting Mac ports these days, so the hard work (DX->OpenGL) is already done.
    Heh... Preaching to the choir there.

    But speaking numbers, Wine's userbase is quite large (some estimates put it around a couple million, IIRC). Not all of it is for gaming of course, but I'd wager a sizeable portion is. TransGaming, who sell Cedega, basically advertises as a gaming-enhanced version of Wine. Codeweavers, who sell CrossOver and help fund Wine development, also does quite well. So, there are quite a few users here a publisher can sell to.
    Indeed. The biggest problem would be the end-results of the Loki and a few other things. We don't have a good sales metric- the WINE figures are not for SALES, but for estimated userbase. Again, SALES are what they care about, not potential ones...

    But of course, we need a good game.. not many people will buy decade-old ports of games no one has heard of or cared about. The few older games that stand the test of time (eg. Morrowind) will do better, but the fresher a popular game is in the minds of gamers (Oblivion, Prey, etc) the better chances of it getting sold.
    The problem lies in that the games "nobody heard about" are the only ones that the studio or publisher will give you reasonable rates on right at the moment for the large part- and the stuff "everybody wants", they more often than not want silly large amounts of cash on in the class of 6 figures just to make the port happen.

    Anyhow, this isn't a yet another discussion about what's busted and how one would fix it if you've got the cash. This is about getting some traction that gets their attention or to completely change the rules of the game. I'm for either.

    Complaining about not having them isn't going to get you anywhere.
    Complaining about not selling isn't going to get you anywhere- because advertising, etc. costs lots of money.
    Complaining about the age of stuff isn't going to get you anywhere.

    Changing the rules, however, may do so. That's really what this discussion thread is about.

    Back to the topic of discussion... In the case of Beyond Good and Evil, I think it's not a foregone conclusion and we might be able to at least START a discussion on the subject with Ubisoft. But... (always one in there, isn't there?) I honestly want to set people's expectations. We've (the Linux community as a whole...) already spurned a few titles that were segways into getting that sort of deal or getting them to give us the time of day for serious with the first in the franchise.

  7. #127
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Mexico City, Mexico
    Posts
    899

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf View Post
    I'm proposing working at trying to change the game- because it's very most definitely gotten taken over, in the large, by the same crowd that's screwed up all that's fubared in the music and movie businesses.
    Actually that's what I had in mind when I was thinking about this. It is easy to spot the need for a publisher from a studio when you have into account what's needed for the sales (advertisement, storage, handling, shipping, etc, etc). Taking Valve as an example and their on-line distribution (and how this model has been adopted by many more publishers and developers), it would be safe to assume, at least direct on-line sales from studios is now possible (given broad band penetration and costs associated), not to mention that they can now be in full control over the mechanisms.

    That still doesn't account for the advertisement which would also mean a huge amount of money, however taking matters into their own hands, developers can now decide how much resources are destined to advertisement, etc. I know that even cutting this man in the middle, the amount of money required is enormous. I wonder if a campaign of donations would accomplish anything (maybe worth exploring the idea).

  8. #128
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    It would be nice though if you could apply this request to your own comments :
    Heh... I'm trying to clip it off, sir (Please note in most of these I'm trying to get people to get back on track in my comments...)- several people brought in asides and I'm trying to herd all the cats back on topic. You peppering things isn't going to help, k?

  9. #129
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Thetargos View Post
    I know that even cutting this man in the middle, the amount of money required is enormous. I wonder if a campaign of donations would accomplish anything (maybe worth exploring the idea).
    That's why people have been warned that we may need to pass a hat around on some of this.

    The only concern is that you have money changing hands with the specific expectation for getting something for it- if you don't succeed for any reason, you have to return the money. It's messy.

    I honestly need to go back through, edit the main post as well as summarize at the tail end what the list looks like so far and start wending through a few of the suggestions to see what we can manage out of the current suggestion crop.

  10. #130
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    465

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf View Post
    That's why people have been warned that we may need to pass a hat around on some of this.

    The only concern is that you have money changing hands with the specific expectation for getting something for it- if you don't succeed for any reason, you have to return the money. It's messy.
    Not forgetting the accusations of stealing the money if you are unable to return it as it's been spent legitimately. As well as the actual risk of someone doing a runner of course, I mean the amount need to port a game would make it tempting for a lot of people.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •