Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Choosing the right chipset for a HTPC

  1. #1

    Default Choosing the right chipset for a HTPC

    Hi All,

    I'm building a Linux-based HTPC, and am attracted to various AMD/ATI 690G boards. Mainly because of low cost, low power integrated graphics (X1250) with HDMI output already built in.

    The other main option is an all Intel solution, with a G33 chipset. I would probably drive my TV with a DVI-to-HDMI cable in this case, as inbuilt HDMI are a bit harder to come by.

    I'd like to know experiences people have with driving HD televisions with these chipsets. I'd like to get 1080p video output and basic OpenGL with enough performance to run the various HTPC interfaces such as XbMC (for linux), elisa, mythtv and linuxmce.

    - Is ATI still too much of a pain, despite recent improvements? Are the video playback acceleration capabilities working properly on linux?
    - Is the Intel too slow? Does it have video playback acceleration?
    - Would I be better off with a discrete card? Which one?

    My laptop's nvidia is quite good through DVI, but has some occasional video tearing. Plus I want to support Intel and AMD with their open source strategies if possible.

    Thanks in advance,

    L

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    370

    Default

    my brother has an G33 gigabyte board with hdmi plug on..

    What you have, is XV from the intel driver, and it works well.

    3d is also very usable, allthough it naturally does not match that of highend cards..

  3. #3

    Default

    Thanks,

    I think after a bit more research I'll go with the Intel. They seem to have fixed their Xv issues, and the Nvidia/ATI alternatives don't have great support for hardware video decoding on Linux. Of course, I can always buy a discrete ATI/Nvidia card if the integrated Intel isn't up to it, wheras I can't buy a discrete Intel card.

    I'm almost tempted to wait for the G45 chipset release, but it seems to be pushed back further and further (September even?).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,441

    Default

    Not trying to change your mind or anything, just wanted to point out that Xv is not video decode acceleration. Xv is video *render* acceleration ie "the stuff that happens after decoding". Video decode includes IDCT and MC, while video render includes colour space conversion, scaling and de-interlacing.

    XvMC is where real "video decode" acceleration starts.

    Now, that said, I expect Intel will have XvMC in open source drivers before we do, so carry on
    Last edited by bridgman; 06-29-2008 at 10:41 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,615

    Default

    Basically mpeg2 decode is no problem for current CPUs at all. And XV means that the scaling is accellerated. The real problem is h264, especially inside TS streams. I would like to see accellerated codecs, maybe thru CUDA. Did you notice that somebody implemented a CUDA wrapper for ATI to run Physx? Wouldn't it be nice when ATI developers could just reuse the CUDA software which is already written? All you need to do would be some CUDA wrapper libs which map to the ATI ABI.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Choosing the right chipset for a Linux HTPC might be the question of the decade.

    It is not really clear what we can expect from each manufacturer in the NEAR future.

    AMD/Ati UVP support for linux is planned for RV710. In fact I'm not even sure of this. If someone could confirm this ? (bridgman ?).

    If it is confirmed, as RV710 is coming soon (september) it might interesting to wait for it...

    Otherwise, there is the G45 that is currently under test from many windows user (AV forum), but unfortunatley no one under linux ... But I don't expect much for HA under linux currently, as even under windows it is still buggy/draft ...

    I've been waiting for month to build my new HTPC, but it could be delayed until september, or even end of the year ...

    Requirements are:

    - HDMI sound support (not requesting bitstreaming/PAVP, but at least raw 8 channels LPCM)

    - Hardware acceleration

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    370

    Default

    by hardware acceleration you mean hardware H264 decoding?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    67

    Default XvMC for Chrome

    Appariently there is open source XvMC for Chrome,
    but no one ever mentions Chrome. Why? Is there
    something wrong with Chrome I should know about?
    Assume: Xv and XvMC required, gaming is NOT required.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    370

    Default

    why do you care about xvmc?! its only for mpeg, and any cpu you could possibly acquire through any retail shop today have no problems doing 1080p mpeg2 decoding..

    if you want your life to be easy, you'll forget decode acceleration, and aim for intel graphics and get a fairly powerful cpu, some E8400 or E8500.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Yes I mean H264/VC1 hardware decoding.

    I'd like to use an E5200 or E7200 max. I think it is some kind of waste to use the CPU to decode, when you have a powerful GPU chip aside.

    To lower the heat and power consumption, obviously the smallest CPU is the best, so the choosen GPU requires "full" support under linux as well ...

    The pity is that it seems it won't happen for long ... :'(

    Dieter: I didn't knew Chroms chipset until you mentioned them. But I S3 Chrome are only for video, so it would not match the requirements audio+video for the perfect htpc. I don't think you can find a motherboard that provide chrome + audio 8ch LPCM / HDMI.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •