Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 42

Thread: KDE 4.1 Released, KDE 4.2 In January

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,434

    Default KDE 4.1 Released, KDE 4.2 In January

    Phoronix: KDE 4.1 Released, KDE 4.2 In January

    The KDE community has today announced the release of KDE 4.1, which comes as the first major update to the KDE 4 code-base. KDE 4.0 was introduced earlier this year at a Google-hosted KDE release event...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NjYzMA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    144

    Default

    The screenshots look wonderful. Just imagine how good KDE would be if it had the support of RedHat and Canonical... It's sad these supposedly FOSS corporations choosing an inferior product (GTK/GNOME) simply so that unscrupulous ISVs can leech off the LGPL'ed frameworks without sharing anything back.
    Last edited by stan; 07-29-2008 at 01:23 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    405

    Default

    Selling closed-source software is not an unparalleled evil, as much as Stallman would like you to believe it is.

    It is essential for any basic platform/api to be totally free to develop on (Windows and Mac OSX both are, I might add.) As much as I am impressed by KDE's accomplishments, and believe it has, in many ways, a superior design to Gnome, I don't believe that while QT is GPL'd, it will ever gain widespread acceptance. Therefore, in spite of it's technical inferiority, I think that Gnome will continue to dominate.

    I think if Nokia were to LGPL QT (for example, in order to promote their phones, which is supposedly the reason they bought Trolltech in the first place), KDE would quickly become the favored DE.
    Last edited by TechMage89; 07-29-2008 at 01:12 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Wow. I was gonna say nice going KDE, but as it still has it's share of die-hard fanatics claiming all other products are inferior and no DE should be used for commercial purposes...

    Well, I certainly don't want to be part of that crowd.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    144

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vadi View Post
    Wow. I was gonna say nice going KDE, but as it still has it's share of die-hard fanatics claiming all other products are inferior and no DE should be used for commercial purposes...
    You are deliberately trying to confuse "commercial" with "proprietary/closed source". There are plenty of open source applications and operating systems that cost a ton of money, thus making them "commercial". In fact, the Free Software Foundation encourages FOSS developers to make money off their software: Selling Free Software
    Last edited by stan; 07-29-2008 at 01:20 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,162

    Default

    I can see at least Canonical supporting KDE more and more and more in the future, I'd even say there's a chance that KDE could get the default desktop by KDE 4.3 or so (@Michael: yeeeeeeees!).

    Amarok, K3b, KOffice, Kaffeine, Kopete, Konversation are not finally released for KDE4 yet, but they should at the time KDE 4.2 arrives (maybe even at the time the October Distributions arrive?). And at THAT time, really no one should continue hurting himself with using that other brown thing, I am not going to say its name, so it's hard to find out what I'm talking about (or not)...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    678

    Default

    I'm not confusing anything, because proprietary/closed source can be commercial (and free) too. Thanks!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    PL
    Posts
    913

    Default

    I don't believe that while QT is GPL'd, it will ever gain widespread acceptance.
    but it has widespread acceptance...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,113

    Default

    I remember reading somewhere that KDE has a bigger user base, but that GNOME is more accepted by the big distros.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    139

    Default

    Qt has widespread acceptance as it is dual licensed. For proprietary apps you have to pay, but if you want to develop OS apps its free. It is the best of both worlds.

    Add that to the fact that you can practically make an app that compiles and works (mostly) an all 3 major oses...Many kde apps compiled and worked out of the box on osx and windows and ultimately is something that could bring many more developers to linux.

    Urgh didn't want to come across as a salesman, but ultimately it works out better than gtk (which suffers somewhat from lack of resources).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •