Page 2 of 17 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 168

Thread: Future of my support for ATI

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Albuquerque NM USA
    Posts
    349

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonlord View Post
    Furthermore do you count in the millions of servers running Un*x? They do not produce "Browser Hits"... they get 'em
    They don't buy video cards, either.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Albuquerque NM USA
    Posts
    349

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    370

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rbmorse View Post
    Wishful thinking, I'm afraid.
    i dont know how it is in your country, but here in denmark, i can tell you, that everywhere i've been, theres a higher concentration of linux boxes than osx boxes.. discounting when i pass by a crappleshop..

    and when the very few occasions come where one sees a crapbook, its mostly running winblows, hell, i have actually seen more crapbooks running linux than osx, allthough im SURE that they count as a dozen osx's in various statistics..

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    Yep, those numbers seem pretty typical :

    90.89% Windows
    7.94% Mac
    0.80% Linux

    and when the very few occasions come where one sees a crapbook, its mostly running winblows, hell, i have actually seen more crapbooks running linux than osx, allthough im SURE that they count as a dozen osx's in various statistics..
    That makes sense... I think the Mac sales figures are actually higher than the browser hit figures, so that supports your statement that a lot of Mac's are either running Linux or Windows. The browser hits are based on OS not HW brand though, so Mac should really be read as OS/X.

    Running multiple OSes on a machine seems to bias the reported results in favour of the least-popular OSes, ie it probably boosts the reported share of Linux and the Mac OS.
    Last edited by bridgman; 07-31-2008 at 04:59 PM.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    370

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Yep, those numbers seem pretty typical :

    90.89% Windows
    7.94% Mac
    0.80% Linux



    That makes sense... I think the Mac sales figures are actually higher than the browser hit figures, so that supports your statement that a lot of Mac's are either running Linux or Windows. The browser hits are based on OS not HW brand though, so Mac should really be read as OS/X
    basing on browser hits, especially on some specific sites, are just extremely stupid.

    for instance, i have seen people in charge of websites say: "because we dont see many firefox users on our site, we wont make the site work in firefox"... Coming from a person which seemingly want people to think he is just the least bit intelligent, but in reality, how the hell does he expect linux or firefox users to actually bother go to the site if it cannot be used with it?!

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    Yep, that's a fair point. That said, I think the report tended to focus on large sites which do support most of the common browsers.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,132

    Default

    But still, it is quite interesting. I do not know a single person owning a Mac, while a can name quite a few Linux users.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    Yeah, it depends a lot on where you live. There probably isn't a single Mac within a 20 mile radius of my house (vs lots of Windows PCs and maybe one Linux user) but in downtown Toronto everyone and their dog seems to have a Mac. I think the location of Apple stores is probably a good indicator of where sales were high -- mostly downtown core of bigger cities.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    260

    Default

    Hmmm.. .8%
    I hope I live to see the day where Linux gets above 3$ market share, and I'm only 15 :P

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    314

    Default

    One thing that gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling is that while the percentage market share of any non-Windows OS is quite low, the desktop market is at least ten times what it was ten years ago when Linux first really started maturing and taking off on the desktop. So a fraction of a percentage is still large enough to give you a self-supporting community with ample developer power to keep going in spite of anything else. If you take a look at the Ubuntu forums now, it's probably got as much activity as any Windows-based community had in 1998.

    So even though companies the size of AMD/nVidia barely notice whether they're supporting these OSes or not, I think it's strategically ludicrous to be hostile or stubborn against it the way some companies are - there's enough support and money in .8% of the market to fund any Joe Nobody with a good idea to grow into something capable of challenging the behemoths. Imagine if it was a small start-up that came up with the EEE PC, they'd be huge now compared to when they started.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •