Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: DRM Patches For Linux 2.6.27 Kernel

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,629

    Default DRM Patches For Linux 2.6.27 Kernel

    Phoronix: DRM Patches For Linux 2.6.27 Kernel

    The Linux 2.6.26 kernel had featured updated Intel and ATI DRM that added the needed kernel support for the ATI R500 and Intel GMA 4500 3D support. While the merge window for the Linux 2.6.27 kernel has already closed, we will hopefully see a few more Direct Rendering Manager (DRM) patches...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NjY3MQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    598

    Default

    Is DRM specific to each card GPU, or does the DRM not need to be updated for future GPU?

    Another way to ask the same =) Does the DRM contain GPU specific code?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,434

    Default

    Yes, a good chunk of the DRM is GPU-specific and the proportion of GPU-specific code is growing as memory management and kernel modesetting are added. Dave Airlie recently re-organized the DRM source code to make it more like a typical kernel driver and to make the GPU-specific portions of the code easier to find and manage.

    If you think of DRM as "the kernel driver for graphics" that will give you a pretty good understanding -- with the added complication that most of the same DRM code is also used with FreeBSD, Solaris and other OSes.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    598

    Default

    So that was what his huge patch was about =)

    Does this mean, that AMD will spilt future specifications up in a DRM spec, 2D, 3D, and ISA spec?

    Or can it not be divided like that?

    Thanks for the DRM ~ "the kernel driver for graphics" =)

  5. #5

    Default

    Linus Torvalds to David Airlie:

    Quote Originally Posted by Linus
    Quite frankly, I'm not going to take this.

    None of what you describe sounds like regressions, and this is just TOO F*CKING LATE to take big changes like this, to a fragile subsystem that has historically easily introduced new regressions.

    Can you please make a branch with ONLY REGRESSIONS, or fixes for major problems that don't introduce several thousand lines of new code?

    Because you seem to be constantly unable to understand what "merge window" means. And I'm not going to take this kind of crap.

    Linus

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    Linus Torvalds to David Airlie:
    Hmm, I ve seen Linus being jumpy like that before. Maybe he should do some anger managment or sing "Im so pretty" when the steam goes up.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    598

    Default

    or maybe do like this guy? =)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5zvvDtAfx0

    What did Airlie do? Will he still commit new patches?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    269

    Default

    Linus scares me :'(

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The intarwebs
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Scary and a little mean sounding maybe, but he /is/ right.

    The thing is, I think the DRM folks wanted to get their code into the next volley of major distros....

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    PL
    Posts
    910

    Default

    linus has a point, but sometimes (like this one) he is way too aggressive with expressing his opinion.

    i'd be pissed if i were airlied, but i would also have to agree with linus. new stuff comes in merge window, after it's closed - it's bugfixing only.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •