+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: ATI to Enable High-Definition Video Playback on Linux-Based Computers

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,594

    Default ATI to Enable High-Definition Video Playback on Linux-Based Computers

    ATI to Enable High-Definition Video Playback on Linux-Based Computers

    Quote Originally Posted by X-bit labs
    ATI, graphics product group of Advanced Micro Devices, plans to enable playback of protected high-definition content under Linux operating system (OS) sometime in October, 2008. The move will allow the company to address the market of Linux-based computers with a unique feature, which is not currently available.
    Source: X-bit labs

    Comment: Catalyst 8.10 will be a fine release

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    87

    Default

    the driver can't even play a hd video without tearing

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5,495

    Default

    And you need a playback tool not only a driver...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mirak63
    the driver can't even play a hd video without tearing
    This thread is about the Catalyst 8.10, we don't know how the situation will be with that driver

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano
    And you need a playback tool not only a driver...
    This thread is about the month October, we don't know if video players will be prepared at this time

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    269

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mirak63 View Post
    the driver can't even play a hd video without tearing
    This is because of the xorg, I hear...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Germany/NRW
    Posts
    510

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sundown View Post
    This is because of the xorg, I hear...
    It's not impossible but pretty hard to do afaik. xf86-video-ati has a branche witch Xv-vsync. But that only works without a compositor.

    @topic: Well, I'm not realy excited. Bug-fixes and X Server 1.5 support are more wanted by me... Then again, I'm not using fglrx anymore anyway . But it would be nice to be able to switch for some gaming without having to downgrade the X Server.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    6,087

    Default

    Yeah, I think the problem with Alex's patch is that it blocks the X server until vsync arrives, which is kind of a Bad Thing for general purpose use (and is the reason Alex doesn't want to push the patch into the production tree).

    The longer term solution seems to be setting up a mechanism to pass a buffer to DRM and have DRM blit/flip it into the front buffer on the next vblank. It's another of those "not too hard to implement but needs to be re-written once we have a memory manager so let's do it after memory management" things, AFAIK.
    Last edited by bridgman; 09-03-2008 at 02:09 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zhick View Post
    It's not impossible but pretty hard to do afaik. xf86-video-ati has a branche witch Xv-vsync. But that only works without a compositor.

    @topic: Well, I'm not realy excited. Bug-fixes and X Server 1.5 support are more wanted by me... Then again, I'm not using fglrx anymore anyway . But it would be nice to be able to switch for some gaming without having to downgrade the X Server.
    this interest me, I don't care of 3D or compiz, I can live without it

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    69

    Default

    Enabling playback? I am able to play HD video on my Linux machine perfectly well now. No lag/tear on my x1800 with xf86-video-ati. FGLRX also used to render it fine (unless compiz was enabled). Then wats the fuss about? something to do with vsync or something like legal issues with allowing HD playback in Linux?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    16

    Default

    will it VAAPi ? or other api ?

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts