Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: GNOME 3.0 Art / User-Interface Roadmap

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,557

    Default GNOME 3.0 Art / User-Interface Roadmap

    Phoronix: GNOME 3.0 Art / User-Interface Roadmap

    With GNOME 2.24 having been released this week, attention will soon turn to developing the 2.26 series followed by GNOME 2.28. Following that, at some point in early 2010 we should see the release of GNOME 3.0 (what otherwise would have been known as GNOME 2.30)...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=Njc0OA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    677

    Default

    I like their goals.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    573

    Default

    it seems that gnome 3 should just be called gnome 2.30. if that's their goals, then kde 4 should be kalled kde future edition.

    those gtk2.....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    233

    Default

    They should brake the ABI/API in GTK for the 3th version, the same with Gnome 3. But that is so much work... why not collaborate with Qt/KDE?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Gnome is and was mostly about evolution than revolution. Get over it, please.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1

    Default art?

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: GNOME 3.0 Art / User-Interface Roadmap

    With GNOME 2.24 having been released this week, attention will soon turn to developing the 2.26 series followed by GNOME 2.28. Following that, at some point in early 2010 we should see the release of GNOME 3.0 (what otherwise would have been known as GNOME 2.30)...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=Njc0OA
    The fact that they refer to design as "art" really shows a lot about their degree of sophistication. Can someone define "art" for me please? It has nothing to do with software projects.

    What they will produce is what a bunch of monkey coders slapping together some "art" on whatever it is they put together that day, without any coherent thought.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    403

    Default

    Gnome is about having a solid, usable DE that incrementally improves over time. They're not going to do a huge slew of fancy new stuff, even for a full version increment, because it would compromise the stability of the system.

    Also, it's pointless to complain about preliminary plans that won't be finilized for over a year. Things will change, expect it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    233

    Default

    You are right, Gnome is more like a stable DE, but it is not functional neither customizable.

    A stable, functional and customizable DE is KDE 3.5.

    Even the LHC uses KDE

    More photos:
    http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fo...e-35141-3.html
    http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fo...e-35141-5.html

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    573

    Default

    to be honest, they actually can't do nothing of really new until they won't seriously rework GTK. it's not because they want a stable DE. KDE3 is stable and no one killed it but they are now working on KDE4 for the future. this means that in any critical environment they will use kde3 and not kde4.

    so gnome just must say: we don't have the man power to do what's kde doing and maybe never will.

    about the guy "personne" that talks art as something that has nothing to do with software, you seem to not know how things and human beings work. Microsoft spends a lot of money on artist and psicologist when creating their GUI. This is a vital and important thing for a user. If you notice, Windows always has a GUI that does not disturb anyone, and it's acceptable for 99% users in the world. and this is not coincidence. it's the result of study, research and creation.

    gnome by default is the ugliest thing I've ever seen in the world, and also kde3 isn't the best thing to look at. and I must say that windows(xp/vista) continues to still be the most neutral GUI design that is suitable for all users. microsoft doesn't really know how to do operating systems, but they do know how to do other things like neutral art GUIs, simplicity in most cases and some other stuff.

    so to conclude, art in software is very important because it transmits "feelings" to a user. and when a user works on the computer 8 hours a day, art becomes possibly the most important thing after a stable application.

    ps: to make it clear, I'm personally annoyed from Windows neutral art, but it's like that because it must fit for 99% of people around the world, from home users to offices.
    Last edited by bulletxt; 09-25-2008 at 05:55 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    [quote=bulletxt;47148If you notice, Windows always has a GUI that does not disturb anyone[/quote]

    That disorganized mess of a start menu disturbs me enough, lets just by default have no organization what so ever and slap a apps entry in the root menu. Grrrrr. KDE on the other hand does it right. Organized off the bat in logical categories.

    it's the result of study, research and creation.
    ... and then they miss the obvious such as every other media player out there defaults the space bar to pause play, EXCEPT that abortion called WMP.

    gnome by default is the ugliest thing I've ever seen in the world,
    No argument there.

    and also kde3 isn't the best thing to look at.
    But it is polished enough that it looks @ home in a professional environment.

    One thing that disturbs me about gnome is the "kiddie computer" look it has. KDE 4 started doing that "bloated" look and feel as well but at least one can minimize that with it custom settings.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •