Page 22 of 25 FirstFirst ... 122021222324 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 243

Thread: When Will UT3 For Linux Be Released?

  1. #211
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Romania+Finland
    Posts
    49

    Default

    I don't remember exactly about this jitter thing, but it sounds plausible at least. Maybe one of you guys could post a 10 seconds clip somewhere on the web, with just this point demonstrated: an enemy standing still, and you taking a couple of shots at him, having him straight in the crosshairs? If there's induced inaccuracy on the laugh-gun then I guess the enemy should stand far away when shooting him, so that the inaccuracy can be amplified by the distance to target?

  2. #212
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wyatt View Post
    There is no induced inaccuracy (which, for some bizarre reason, you've taken to calling "jitter") in the Lightning Gun as packaged in UT2003 and UT2004. I can assure you: everything you need to verify what I am saying is right out in the open and easily accessible without a commercial engine license. If you wish to continue to argue this point, you will need to unpack your files and show what code the entire development community has missed in the past five years. Really, though, the only explanation that isn't, "You simply cannot aim," is that you have high latency on your WAN connection.
    The problem with your line of thinking is that "jitter" is the industry accepted term for introducing some randomization of the results into something, whether it's deliberate or not. Moreover, he's largly right- if you're in the same position and you don't get 100% results, there's a variance there.

    You can say that it's not induced, but that would be inaccurate- as if there wasn't some random variances, due to a physics model that doesn't work consistently to a random-walk algorithm for in-flight behavior, you would get 100% of the shots 100% of the time if they're properly lined up. I've observed a bit of this myself in the game. "High latency on your wan connection" would also count as a cause of Jitter. And I don't seem to recall some of the other online deathmatch type games having quite so much issues with latency- moreover, I've noticed the issue in question from time to time and I don't HAVE a really high-latency connection and haven't had one for quite some time.

    PS: "Hit-scan" is an accepted domain term of players, modders, and many developers and could not be called "incorrect" in the slightest.
    Uh... I'd not heard the term before and I've been at doing game dev for a bit now.
    Last edited by Svartalf; 03-09-2009 at 08:39 AM.

  3. #213
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    357

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonlord View Post
    Please read what I posted. A hit-scan ( correct term is ray-cast by the way ) yields a boolean result, this is correct, but the DIRECTION into which the ray-cast is done is random. Otherwise I would not have gotten this miserable hit ratios in my testings. Games like Q3A have no jittering on the ray-cast and therefore are always accurate. This is not the case here as otherwise I would have obtained a 100% hit rate which is not the case. It's a common trick done by developers to balance weapons by adding inaccuracy to strong ones or long reload times ( or small clips ). Here though they went too far turning the LG into a laugh-gun. At last in UT3 the sniper is a sniper again as it should be: powerful but slow.
    2k3/2k4 sniper and lg are the exact same weapon but with different models/effects/sounds

    the sniper is better but only because its harder to see where the shot comes from

  4. #214
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    833

    Default

    Can't talk about the Sniper. In my version it did not exist, only the LG.

  5. #215
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    357

    Default

    its a mutator that comes with the game also there is no lg on deck 17 just sniper

  6. #216
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonlord View Post
    Can't talk about the Sniper. In my version it did not exist, only the LG.
    That was in 2K3, I have both on a standard disc (so that means the 1.0 version) and 2K4 really comes standard with the sniper rifle. You might have missed it because all of the 2K3 maps that where in 2K4 still had the LG instead of the Sniper.

    Quote Originally Posted by Svartalf View Post
    Uh... I'd not heard the term before and I've been at doing game dev for a bit now.
    But not UT related dev. work, right?

    I have been a UT fanatic in the past (99/2K4 era), and the term 'hitscan' is commonly used among UT players and mappers.

    Proving it is easy: Just go to a site like Beyond Unreal, or Epics own forums. Type 'hitscan' in the search field and you'll see we are right.

  7. #217
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    833

    Default

    Just because "one" company does this doesn't make it the standard, right?

  8. #218
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MaestroMaus View Post
    That was in 2K3, I have both on a standard disc (so that means the 1.0 version) and 2K4 really comes standard with the sniper rifle. You might have missed it because all of the 2K3 maps that where in 2K4 still had the LG instead of the Sniper.


    But not UT related dev. work, right?

    I have been a UT fanatic in the past (99/2K4 era), and the term 'hitscan' is commonly used among UT players and mappers.

    Proving it is easy: Just go to a site like Beyond Unreal, or Epics own forums. Type 'hitscan' in the search field and you'll see we are right.
    No offense, but just because a term is commonly used does not make it any more right or valid. For example 3 1/2 " Floppies were commonly referred to as "hard disks" too at one point as well which was as incorrect of a term as you can get or the use of the term copyprotection instead of DRM when applicable is another example.

  9. #219
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonlord View Post
    Just because "one" company does this doesn't make it the standard, right?
    No, you fail twice:
    1. The company and the community does it.
    2. Since the UT scene does it, it makes it a standard for that scene. And we where not talking about the games in general here. We where talking about UT.

    So, my point still stands.

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    No offense, but just because a term is commonly used does not make it any more right or valid. For example 3 1/2 " Floppies were commonly referred to as "hard disks" too at one point as well which was as incorrect of a term as you can get or the use of the term copyprotection instead of DRM when applicable is another example.
    Language history learns that language rules change conform the use of the language. This is very logical, because rules that aren't followed by anyone, are apparently useless and get scrapped. At the same time, there might be rules that everyone follows, but who aren't in the rulebooks. These rules are likely to hit the rulebook because people feel this rule is apparently necessary.

    Your thought however isn't strange at all. These days, a lot of people try to retain their language the way it is (especially in the UK) "because rules are to be followed" usually with a cultural argument of some kind. It is also easier nowadays to do that, because we have a far better schoolsystem then we did when language was more 'evolving'. It always get's through though (yes, even in the UK ). Just think about the many ways to say something is cool. New ones always surface.

    Another great example is the word "hacking". Many people use the word hacking or hackers, while they actually mean cracking and crackers. This mistake is so common in the Netherlands that the word hacking actually stands in the dictionary with the definition of cracking (imagine the confusion when IT people are talking to each other and one uses the English definition, while the other doesn't).
    Last edited by MaestroMaus; 03-09-2009 at 07:31 PM.

  10. #220
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    833

    Default

    Uhm... great... looks like UT elitisms is hitting the scene. No place for me then. I prefer conducting "sane" discussions and not fanboy talk.

    Over and out.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •