Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 78

Thread: Radeon vs. RadeonHD Fighting Continues

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,649

    Default Radeon vs. RadeonHD Fighting Continues

    Phoronix: Radeon vs. RadeonHD Fighting Continues

    If you thought disputes among X.Org developers were going to stop in regards to there being two leading ATI drivers (xf86-video-ati and xf86-video-radeonhd) after RadeonHD switched to using AtomBIOS, guess again. Daniel Stone committed a change to the X Server this morning that drops the RadeonHD driver as an X.Org module. Of course, this led to Luc Verhaegen (one of the RadeonHD developers at Novell) bringing this up on the X.Org mailing list...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NjgwMA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    158

    Default

    RadeonHD should die ...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    139

    Default

    I can't for the life of me see why RadeonHD isn't being dropped and it's features merged with radeon.

    Judging from that exchange it appears that the HD devs are quite opinionated in regards to the way their drivers are designed, dunno if that their high opinion is warranted or not. Anyone care to provide an unbiased opinion?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    145

    Default

    even better: drop and get rid of ati and radeonhd. develop a fist class gallium3d-driver, test and optimize it and make it an alternative the to proprietary fglrx. but it's keeping a dream

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    PL
    Posts
    910

    Default

    anything but this :/

    that starting flamerwar _really_ sucks. it's bound to hit linuxhater soon ;-)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The intarwebs
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Benchmark the suckers! Fastest one on a given card gets that PCI-ID.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Heh, I love it when politics gets involved with development. With internal squabbling and backstabbing being done like this I can really see yet another fork of X in the future. Unfortunately this is the exact type of behavior that feeds the advocates of closed source development.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    404

    Default

    Uhm, radeon vs radeonhd doesn't have anything to do with Gallium3D. They both use the same mesa 3D driver, and the only real difference is modesetting code. That said, the duplication of effort going on here isn't really great.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    269

    Default

    I have xorgs, xservers and mesas built from Debian experimental with latest radeon and radeonhd driver and still radeonhd can't cope with EXA... it makes the computer very slow and fan spins like crazy. I was disappointed.
    Last edited by sundown; 10-21-2008 at 04:12 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Isn't this meaningless ?
    I mean soon we will see KMS for radeon cards. With modesseting in the kernel both radeon and radeonhd will be not needed.... or correct me if I'm wrong ? isn't all that's going to be left in the Xorg just the mesa (which both drivers share)?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •