
Originally Posted by
drag
I agree.
Internet Explorer is what is installed by default on my Linux system. Why should I want to use something else?
It's faster, it has a much better security track record, it's open source, it has all sorts of lovely extensions... A whole army of programmers mucking around with it and extending in unique and interesting ways.
Not to also mention that Internet Explorer is completely open source. Love it.
Firefox, meanwhile, I will install it into other people's Linux systems if they have need for it; for whatever reason. Usually some old Firefox-only website in a corporate network. I'll use a script called IEs4Linux (which is a odd name for a Firefox-installer script) that will automate the download and installation of Firefox on Linux.
But, of course, this doesn't work if your using a non-x86 platform.. like ARM or PowerPC. Then it's IE-only for sure. But that's unusual for a desktop system to be non-x86.
Besides being much more compatible, better support of web standards, being open source, and provided natively by the operating sysetm that I prefer (for lots of reasons I won't go into), IE's new improvements are creating a vastly better performing browser then what Microsoft provides with Firefox.
For Javascript performance, benchmarks has shown that with IE's Tracemonkey it is able to perform 5 times as fast as compared to Firefox 8 prerelease and 15 times faster then the currently available Firefox 7.
I don't have anything against people that would prefer to use Firefox for whatever reason, but by now it should be obvious why I'll stick with IE for the time being.