Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31

Thread: Plymouth To Replace USplash In Ubuntu?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Great, a fancy boot splash to cover up terribly slow boot is extremely important. Rrrrrright.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The intarwebs
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Don't think that boot-up time isn't going to get blazing fast. Intel has made too much news with their awesome 4 second Fedora boot time to let that happen.

    If it gets in by 9.04, I'll be elated.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Here's a spoiler for you: it will never get that fast for general-purpose Desktop machines. The 5 seconds were only achieved with a non-generic kernel which statically included all hardware drivers, a custom, stripped down init sequence and a stripped-down X server and desktop environment. Booting will probably get a little bit faster in the future, but not by that much.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sundown View Post
    Frankly, how is Wubi more important to people like me who run only Linux?
    It's not but linux isn't about what sundown wants.

    In short I don't get the whole people bitching about different groups working on different things. The linux philosophy has always been if you want something then contribute code to it.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    269

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ze.. View Post
    The linux philosophy has always been if you want something then contribute code to it.
    And as far as I know Ubunutu is the most famous distro that doesn't contribute anything when it comes to the Linux kernel (or in general) or am I mistaken?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The intarwebs
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sundown View Post
    And as far as I know Ubunutu is the most famous distro that doesn't contribute anything when it comes to the Linux kernel (or in general) or am I mistaken?
    Our users submit more feedback than... yeah, you're mistaken.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    269

    Default

    Is 'feedback' 'code' too?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The intarwebs
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sundown View Post
    Is 'feedback' 'code' too?
    Who cares?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    269

    Default

    I don't know, ask Ze..

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,128

    Default

    And as far as I know Ubunutu is the most famous distro that doesn't contribute anything when it comes to the Linux kernel (or in general) or am I mistaken?
    It's true.

    But it's also true that this observation misses the point. Canonical simply doesn't have the resources to work on the kernel like RedHat or Novell do. However, it has managed to do something that may be even more important in the long run: it has made the general public aware of something called Ubuntu, which is free and competes with the likes of Windows. It's other main contribution is Launchpad, which serves for triaging and coordinating bug reports throughout the linux ecosystem.

    Maybe you don't care for any of these, because perhaps you don't use or don't like Ubuntu, but they are necessary if Linux is ever to become useful to the general public.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •