Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Sun Provides 64-bit Java Plug-In For Linux

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    10,219

    Default Sun Provides 64-bit Java Plug-In For Linux

    Phoronix: Sun Provides 64-bit Java Plug-In For Linux

    After years of complaints by its users, last month Adobe released 64-bit Flash for Linux. Now this month Sun Microsystems has come to the table with a Java plug-in that is compatible with 64-bit web browsers...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NjkyOQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Die trolls, die!
    Posts
    525

    Default

    Are we talking about openjdk or the non-free java here? If it's the closed java, why don't they support the openjdk, that it can fully replace the non free java? I really like that they help with openjdk, but there should be a 100% free java that works 100% like the closed java. It works almost perfect, but there are in some applications minor ugly-looking things.
    For me openjdk is more important than the closed java.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    187

    Default

    It's a great news for me. I've just recently switched to 64bits, mostly thanks to the 64b flashplugin and now java-plugin in coming. Awesome ^^;

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Parish, NY
    Posts
    159

    Default

    Man, seems like Sun doesn't like its own OS. First JavaFX (which is only for Windows... wtf?), now normal Java?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    661

    Default

    About time! I'll give it a try as soon as a .deb for ubuntu is available.

    Both gcj and openjdk failed to work properly in various java applets.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    553

    Default

    aleluya aleluya

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    661

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bulletxt View Post
    aleluya aleluya
    It's spelled "hallujah" in english actually

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,333

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vadi View Post
    It's spelled "hallujah" in english actually
    Spelling cop :P

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    553

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vadi View Post
    It's spelled "hallujah" in english actually
    who said that was english?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    31

    Default

    Actually alleluia and hallelujah are both acceptable. It comes from the greek work with the hallelujah pronunciation, however, there was no letter 'h' in greek, only a "rough" breathing, shown with a little ' sign on top of the alpha. So hallelujah is technically more true to the original greek word, however, when it was translated from greek in the Bible etc, the 'h' sound was often omitted (as it was not so obvious). Alleluia is a mistake, but it is established none-the-less as a correct spelling
    /pronunciation of alleluia/hallelujah.

    Sorry for rambling on :P, just got carried away...
    Last edited by Xanikseo; 12-15-2008 at 05:17 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •