Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Terry Makedon (AMD/ATI): "We can't open our drivers"

  1. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saist View Post
    If I might make a comment here. I see a lot of people hammering on ATi for not opening their drivers...

    so, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't Nvidia-GLX proprietary as well? I've seen a lot of comments about people "converting" from ATi to Nvidia.

    Isn't that just changing the pot for the kettle? Are not both black?

    Maybe I'm just wrong about this, but before anybody go slamming on ATi for not open sourcing the drivers, shouldn't Nvidia also be targeted in the same breath or post?

    Yes, NVIDIA's are binary blobs as well. However, many people end up converting from ATI -> NVIDIA due to the slower performance of the fglrx drivers, installation problems, etc..

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    102

    Default

    To be frank, the fglrx drivers, nowadays, are not harder to install and get working than the nvidia drivers.

    As for Open source drivers, I do not care all that much about that, as long as the drivers are working properly with up to par performance.

    As long as I can remember, the original Radeon, Radeon SE, Rage 128 and even the mach32 and 64, I always managed to get the ati cards to work correctly and with good performance in linux.

    Like it is now, it is cheaper to get an nvidia card than an ATI card for the same level of performance in linux. I am tired of funding a company, ehich doesn't care all that much about it's linux users, for the sole reason that this company is Canadian like I am, which btw is not the case anymore. Now I want to support companies which really support linux, nvidia for their good linux support and Intel for their open source drivers and their excellent programming tools (compiles, profilers, optimizers and debugging tools).

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default

    Neither have opened their drivers, true. But NVidia do have far better driver support, even though it is in a closed binary. Black, but less black than AMD.

  4. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glussier View Post
    To be frank, the fglrx drivers, nowadays, are not harder to install and get working than the nvidia drivers.
    Yeah, sure. I can agree to this on one thing. ATi can automate the installation. Working is a totally different matter.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    PL
    Posts
    913

    Default

    getting a fglrx kernel module is not a big problem, but making the xorg part to work is sometimes tricky :]

    so i can partially agree with that.

    btw i just found something that resembles the post of one proprietary driver ex-developer i mentioned. (although that's not the one i was looking for)

    http://ajaxxx.livejournal.com/53522....133650#t133650
    Last edited by yoshi314; 03-17-2007 at 03:17 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •