Page 18 of 20 FirstFirst ... 81617181920 LastLast
Results 171 to 180 of 199

Thread: AMD Releases Open-Source R600/700 3D Code

  1. #171
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    4

    Default

    You can use a converter box on any analog card, like the pvr-350, and voila you get a sd mpeg-2 copy of just about any broadcast here in the good ole US of A. Oh and did I mention that you can play it back on as low as a good ole sempron 3100 underclocked at 800 MHZ? Even my be-2300 underclocked to 1ghz can easily handle 1080p mpeg-2 streams aorund here no problemo. MPEG is easy. AVC on the other hand...

  2. #172
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,102

    Default

    This is getting a little ridiculous. You guys are making it sound like people are going to die in some national emergency just because they can't watch their broadcast news in HD on a 5 year old linux computer. That's really the best argument you can come up with? Seriously now, how many people:
    1. Have their fastest computer be one from 5 years ago.
    2. Use Linux.
    3. Don't own a single TV.
    4. Don't have the means to correct this themselves.

    No one really NEEDS XvMC any more than anyone NEEDS 3D support. It's not some basic human right that everyone is entitled to. If it's really that important you, spend the $20 to get a card which supports what you want, or better yet just get a cheap TV.

    The truth is, there are 2 large areas of use that the drivers should be helping out with that nearly everyone uses. 3D support and video. Both have loud minority populations - apparently the video guys want XvMC, and the 3D minority wants to play demanding games. Both have much, much, much larger populations that would be happy with just basic desktop compositing support and x264 decoding. I certainly hope that the developers choose to spend their time focusing on areas which will help the majority of users first, and then move on to the lesser used features later. I'm pretty sure that's going to happen.

    XvMC support would be nice, but I would consider it more of a power saver than a performance feature. I imagine it could be helpful for people who play DVD's on their laptops/netbooks.
    Last edited by smitty3268; 01-07-2009 at 11:55 PM.

  3. #173
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,615

    Default

    H264 acc IS needed. Of course you can buy cpus that can decode even 1080p material (720p should be possible even on cheap ones) but why should Linux users need to buy a much faster cpu than Win users just because of missing driver features? In many other cases Linux tools do not run not slower than on Win - due to missing virus scan they start even faster. VDPAU works pretty well (except that you have to disable composite to get rid of tearing) and ATI needs to show something similar soon. Right now you can only tell ppl to buy those GF8+ cards or onboard solutions for watching H264. You need to compile a bit but then you have got very low cpu usage...

  4. #174
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,130

    Default

    This is getting a little ridiculous. You guys are making it sound like people are going to die in some national emergency just because they can't watch their broadcast news in HD on a 5 year old linux computer. That's really the best argument you can come up with?
    Well said!

    H264 acc IS needed.
    Exactly, and in fact it's needed much more than mpeg2 acceleration (XvMC). Problem is, we need 3d and Xv and a suitable API before H264 can be accelerated in the open drivers. We also need power management, because watching a video with your GPU howling is no fun.

    Not joking about the last part, either: my severely underclocked 4850 card consumes ~65W with RadeonHD vs ~30W with Catalyst when idle. This translates to a fan speed of ~4000RPMs (intolerable) vs ~2000RPMs (barely tolerable). (Yes, I'm going to add a big bad piece of copper and silence it, but the difference is significant.)

  5. #175
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Have a good day.
    Posts
    678

    Default

    no, people want 3D perfornance first. As shown here:

    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag..._results&num=5

    so all that crying about video decoding is just a vocal minority - like always.
    Oh, really? OK, let's have a look at the numbers YOU quoted, then:

    Code:
    OpenGL performance             17.3 %
    Video playback/acceleration    15.1 %
    Licensing/open source          11.5 %
    2D performance                 10.8 %
    Image quality                  10.3 %
    Syspend/hibernate               9.7 %
    Stability                       9.4 %
    Ease of installation/maint.     8.1 %
    Display-related features        4.8 %
    Multi GPU rendering             2.3 %
    Now, apart from the obvious fact that anybody with a first degree in finger counting could acknowledge, one could also argue that the answers given to 'Image quality' are more related to the video playback business than to 3D performance.

    In the same lines seen in some posts in this thread, I could say that efforts to improve 3D performance are a waste of time given the scarcity of linux games and the absolute no need for a compositing desktop. Of course, there would be an army of people including gamers, professional and academic users of 3D graphics software and linux enthusiast that wouldn't be very happy.

    I don't know what's the hard part in understanding that decoding HD MPEG-2 puts quite a stress on the CPU, and that having the hardware we bought to do it would be, uhm, reasonable. The _technical_ questions related to the convenience of implementing this now or doing it within a unified API encompassing MPEG-4 standards are valid and solid. Arguments based on what one would personally like to see are not.

    PS. On the other hand, you guys in the states may have some extra time to lobby for this:http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?.../01/08/2052212
    Last edited by yotambien; 01-08-2009 at 09:44 PM.

  6. #176
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,725

    Default

    you do know that 2d is dead, right? That today is everything is done in the 3d hardware of a card, right? That 3d performance is important to 2d performance and features, right?

    no, you don't.

  7. #177
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    67

    Default

    smitty3268> You guys are making it sound like people are going to
    smitty3268> die in some national emergency just because they can't
    smitty3268> watch their broadcast news

    You seem to think this is far fetched. Stranger things happen
    every day, heck, every minute. Large sections of the US have had
    record setting severe weather the last few weeks. Highways closed,
    trains canceled, flights canceled, grocery store shelves empty,
    power outages, medical facilities closed, the list goes on, and on,
    and on...

    smitty3268> No one really NEEDS XvMC

    I need it. I need mpeg2 accel and I need it now. I am not alone.

    Some of us understand the difference between need and want.
    I would *like* support for other codecs, but that can wait.

    smitty3268> Don't own a single TV.

    I don't see what the marital status of my TV has to do with this.
    If I convince my TV to get a divorce will that help?

    What matters is that most existing TVs only have a NTSC tuner.
    ATSC tuners have only been mandatory for a year, and some stores
    were caught selling NTSC-only TVs past the deadline. Big name
    stores that should know better. So lots of people have NTSC-only TVs,
    even people that bought one very recently. BTW, TVs can last for
    decades, they really need to have the ATSC tuner mandate in place
    for at least 10 years, preferably 15 years or more before shutting
    down the NTSC broadcasts. Maybe someone will develop a decent
    demodulator by then.

    I have looked into the CECBs and big surprise the programmers
    were sloppy and they crash. Do you think they are open source
    so that we can fix the bugs?

    I have looked into other hardware solutions and they have similar
    problems. To have any hope of getting something that works it
    has to be FLOSS so that the bugs can be fixed.

  8. #178
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    459

    Default

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by popper
    i dont know if it (core/nvcuvid) will be usable on linux X86 as yet though.
    bridgman: The nvcuvid library that everything else builds on is Windows only AFAIK.
    im not so sure, see:
    http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...52#post1229752

    BTW are ATI/AMD at CES? go chat with BetaBoy perhaps, he hints he's talking to the Gfx vendors about HW assisted decoding so there may or NOT be a potential use in the near term for a CORE PLAYER...

  9. #179
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,440

    Default

    That link seems to be talking about adding CUDA itself, not the nvcuvid library. CUDA is available on Linux (as is Stream), but AFAIK it's the nvcuvid library which provides access to the decoder hardware and that seems to be Windows only so far. I

    n the future obviously anything is possible.

    AMD is at CES but I'm off ice fishing for the weekend

  10. #180
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    459

    Default

    fishing for ice
    is that one of those (vocal) minority sports

    i may go and ask BB if its nvcuvid library or full CUDA on linux and clarify, but he's not one for fast turn around and someones got to mention the Core Encoder that didnt appear in 2008 and see what comes back....

    BTW,if any reader joins doom9 to try and encurage the devs to look at and contribute to any linux ATI HW assist potential theres a 5 or is it 7 day turn around i forget,before you can post so do it now.

    BTW am i to assume if Betaboy or the other devs there want to get access to the Stream and AVD docs for any apps they write,they stand a better chance than the average open dev getting them and being passed to an internal ATi dev for errata help/advice ?, i may put that to them too if so...

    it might be nice if Dark Shikari ,x264 developer could be convinced to add something ATI HW assist related, he didnt like the NV coding options apparenty...but i dont know the details.
    Last edited by popper; 01-09-2009 at 05:51 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •