Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: GRUB 2 Receives New Font Engine

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,812

    Default GRUB 2 Receives New Font Engine

    Phoronix: GRUB 2 Receives New Font Engine

    GRUB 2, the next-generation Linux boot loader, has received a new font engine. Version 2 of the GRand Unified Bootloader introduces this new font engine that's written in C and with a font tool in Java...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=Njk2Nw

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,791

    Default

    Too much overkill for "just" a bootloader, imo. GRUB 2 has seen too much overengineering.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    677

    Default

    I hope they fix the error reporting. Nevermind that GRUB, being such an important program, doesn't give a solution to the user for helping fix the problem, it doesn't even say what the error is!

    It's the ultimate horror situation for a newbie to be stuck with some "GRUB ERROR ##" and an unusable computer.
    Last edited by Vadi; 01-04-2009 at 10:18 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    962

    Default

    I'd like a good bootloader that does its job well without so much fluff, yet having good error detection and handling

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    130

    Default

    Firstly, I believe GRUB2 will have better device detection and will support more filesystems than GRUB1. Secondly, I'm not sure how important error handling is. TBH, unless you are constantly reinstalling distros on your system, how often do you play around with GRUB confiugrations? More precisely, how often do you re-install grub on a partition? The newbie problem is better handled in the distor itself, making sure that sane and working options are set. Finally, the graphical component of GRUB2 was requested to allow for a better and more seamless desktop experience. Currently it is OK in GRUB1, with some SuSe hacks giving the best results. But after so long if the graphical aspect of grub isn't any nicer than GRUB1, then that would be an opportunity lost.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    11

    Default

    As I understand it (nb: I'm fairly noobish) Grub2 is a requirement for the move to ext4.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    PL
    Posts
    910

    Default

    there are some unofficial patches for old grub as well, just google it.

    as far as this news go - i'd rather see a stable release of grub2, and not bother with eye-candy.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seattle, WA, US
    Posts
    103

    Default

    Grub2 is great, I have been using it since early last year, and had fewer problems than with grub1

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Scripting support? Conditionals? Way too complicated. Meanwhile, Grub 1 recently failed on me because of its vaunted support for reading filesystems. I had installed a new system with ext3, and it had bigger inodes that Grub couldn't read. Of course it took awhile to figure this out. Meanwhile, what worked just fine? LILO! So right now I am having Grub chainload LILO.

    If the choice is between this bloated Grub 2 and LILO, I will pick LILO.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,104

    Default

    There's been a patch for the bigger inodes for grub1 for a while.

    I agree they should get a stable grub2 out and then start working on eyecandy if they want.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •