Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: No X Server 1.6 Release In Sight

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,102

    Default No X Server 1.6 Release In Sight

    Phoronix: No X Server 1.6 Release In Sight

    During the last X Developers' Summit that took place at the Edinburgh Zoo, Keith Packard called for X Server 1.6 to be released by the end of 2008. Once the release schedule was set though, the final ship date for X Server 1.6.0 was the 5th of January...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=Njk3MA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    122

    Default

    I, for one, still appreciate all the developers effort to modernize our graphics infrastructure.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    139

    Default

    Is anybody really surprised by this? Maybe they shouldn't even bother with time based releases.

    This release which was going to be rigid "date or bust" release is delayed, with no real schedule available.

    Seriously, I'm fine if they settled for features and then released, which would also mean distros wouldn't package pre-release xorg which (graphics) drivers don't support.

    On the other hand, if they moved to feature releases we would never get a release this century...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The intarwebs
    Posts
    385

    Default

    It may be nice to see a feature matrix comparison, a LoC comparison, an active developer and weekly commit rate comparison, and so on between Xorg and Wayland.. Like, during that time where no commits were made to Xorg, how much happened in Wayland?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,155

    Default

    I am not disappointed as I don't expect anything from developers that work so hard to make people's lives better, I am just happy when there is a new release. But I still do not understand why so few companys pay developers to work on this maybe 2nd most important piece of a GNU/Linux desktop (with Linux being the most important).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    The Hague, Netherlands
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by d2kx View Post
    I am not disappointed as I don't expect anything from developers that work so hard to make people's lives better, I am just happy when there is a new release. But I still do not understand why so few companys pay developers to work on this maybe 2nd most important piece of a GNU/Linux desktop (with Linux being the most important).
    Perhaps because GNU/Linux is used mostly on servers, which don't have GUI's and as such don't require X.ORG? 70% of Kernel development is done by developers working for companies, but that is also required for a server.

    Just my $0.02

    BTW, I really hope to see Xserver 1.6 in time for ubuntu jaunty, I want DRI 2 so I can use compiz without having to disable it every time I want to play a game. This would also make a WAY better / more stable impression on new users

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,155

    Default

    Xserver 1.6 prerelease is already in Ubuntu Jaunty and the final release should be finished before Ubuntu 9.04. But I am not sure if the radeon/RadeonHD driver will support it until then. But if it's just the driver, one could easily backport/compile a newer version after the new Ubuntu release. Xserver 1.6's most awesome feature is its EXA performance though :P

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    The Hague, Netherlands
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by d2kx View Post
    Xserver 1.6 prerelease is already in Ubuntu Jaunty and the final release should be finished before Ubuntu 9.04. But I am not sure if the radeon/RadeonHD driver will support it until then. But if it's just the driver, one could easily backport/compile a newer version after the new Ubuntu release. Xserver 1.6's most awesome feature is its EXA performance though :P
    Or you can just use the official ATI driver and get two or so times better 3d-performance. I never cared that the NVIDIA drivers (I have a 512 MB GF 8 8600 GT) are closed source, because at least for me, they work fine.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,514

    Default

    I imagine both radeon and radeonhd are working with 1.6 today, although I haven't actually tried them yet. It takes about 9-1/2 years to download a distro image at home, so stuff like that had to wait until I got back to work

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Maybe they just should say "When it's done"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •