Page 1 of 13 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 123

Thread: AMD gets beaten by NVidia, any plans?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,799

    Default AMD gets beaten by NVidia, any plans?

    OK, as of late I'm pretty much fed up. I can't activate PhysX with my ATI card, and the world is moving towards CUDA. There are CUDA video encoders that are rather good. PhysX and CUDA is something AMD doesn't want to support. AMD is losing the game here. Everyone out there supports NVidia and AMD just sits there and does nothing.

    So, the question is, why did I buy an AMD/ATI in the first place? It starts to feel outdated lately (no PhysX, no CUDA.) Will AMD do something here? Will you allow us to enable PhysX in our games? I'm not talking about some future-wonder-tech to appear next year. I'm talking about RIGHT NOW. Because right now, I want to get an NVidia since my ATI runs like s***t with the latest PhysX games and no one supports ATI Stream out there, only CUDA.

    PS:
    I feel ripped-off by AMD. Where's the support for the COOL stuff?
    Last edited by RealNC; 01-26-2009 at 04:29 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Well, the cool stuff (you forgot UVD2) is hard to implement. It requires top-notch developers who are keen on what they are doing. AMD doesn't seem to have such developers to make it. Probably it's the past wrong decisions that are pulling the current devs back. To be honest, ATI control center always sucked to my liking (counter-intuitive, no native look for buttons under WinXP) and it hasn't ever changed much, so it's probably all together.
    Let's face it: AMD fails to live up to expectations of the Linux community for now, but they seem to be moving in the right direction. Unfortunately, this takes excessive amounts of time. Hard to blame them as the stuff in fact is next to rocket science .

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,799

    Default

    They also fail in Windows, not just Linux. No CUDA, no PhysX. Doesn't matter if it's Linux or Windows. AMD lacks it. NVidia has it. The choice for the customer is obvious: NVidia.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,728

    Default

    well, there is 'cuda' for a long time on ATI hardware. Called 'stream'. Just look around before you make yourself looking like a fool. Also doesn't ATI plan to/supports opencl? Which is a nice, open standard to use the video hardware for computing? Nothing so far from nvidia.
    PhysX - well nvidia bought that inc. What do you expect.
    Oh - and I read on several places that the upcoming ATI drivers will bring a 20% increase of performance on quad core cpus ... do the math.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,799

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by energyman View Post
    well, there is 'cuda' for a long time on ATI hardware. Called 'stream'. Just look around before you make yourself looking like a fool.
    You're the fool if you think you can run CUDA on ATI. No one supports Stream. They support CUDA.

    Also doesn't ATI plan to/supports opencl? Which is a nice, open standard to use the video hardware for computing?
    Who cares? Right now they have nothing. I can't use PhysX with my ATI. Is the "plan to support opencl" helping me? I just tried again just now; still doesn't work.

    Nothing so far from nvidia.
    CUDA + PhysX. It's ATI that has nothing.

    PhysX - well nvidia bought that inc. What do you expect.
    Oh - and I read on several places that the upcoming ATI drivers will bring a 20% increase of performance on quad core cpus ... do the math.
    I read everywhere that games went PhysX and video and GPGPU went CUDA. Do the math.

    ATI has nothing right now. NOTHING.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,728

    Default

    are you playing dumb?

    If you are so unhappy, go, buy nvidia. You will see what you get. CUDA will be dead soon - because even APPLE wants opencl. And physx brings you what? Does any game on linux use it?

    Stream has its applications just because you are not able to google ...

    ATI has everything - NVIDIA has a lot of hype and obviously you are failing for it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,799

    Default

    I'm using Windows too, not only Linux. I can't buy NVidia because I bought an ATI. My pocket has limits, you know. I jumped on the wrong train.

    What hype? PhysX is there. No hype. A crapload of games uses PhysX. What hype? There are even plans to port x264 to CUDA. No one even mentions ATI. AMD should support CUDA and PhysX and be done with it. There's no hype. Only fanbois who don't see the situation. Again: Right now, the cool stuff is with NVidia.

    ATI: We'll be awesome next year!
    NVidia: We're awesome RIGHT NOW.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,728

    Default

    please name the crapload of games. And please show where this games run faster in a way that one can tell it without looking on the FPS.

    Oh, and does have CUDA double precision FP? The last time I checked only stream does. Without dp fp CUDA is just a marketing joke. Ok, some fanboys will wet themselves because they can buy a video encoder that runs a bit faster...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,799

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by energyman View Post
    please name the crapload of games. And please show where this games run faster in a way that one can tell it without looking on the FPS.
    Mirror's Edge is UNPLAYABLE (2FPS) on ATI with PhysX enabled. Like the majority of other games: "NVidia: The Way it's Meant to be Played".

    List (probably incomplete) of games supporting PhysX:

    Code:
    2 Days to Vegas
    Adrenalin 2: Rush Hour
    Age of Empires III
    Age of Empires III
    Alpha Prime
    Auto Assault
    Backbreaker
    B.A.S.E. Jumping
    Bet on Soldier: Blackout Saigon
    Bet on Soldier: Blood of Sahara
    Bet on Soldier: Blood Sport
    Beowulf
    Bladestorm: The Hundred Years' War
    Captain Blood
    Cellfactor: Combat Training
    Cellfactor: Revolution
    City of Villains
    Crazy Machines II
    Cryostasis
    Dark Physics
    Desert Diner
    Dragonshard
    Dusk 12
    Empire Above All
    Empire Earth III
    Entropia Universe
    Fallen Earth
    Fury
    Gears Of War
    Gluk'Oza: Action
    GooBall
    Gothic 3
    Gunship Apocalypse
    Heavy Rain
    Hero's Jorney
    Hour of Victory
    Hunt, The
    Infernal
    Inhabited island: Prisoner of Power
    Joint Task Force
    Kuma\WAR
    Magic ball 3
    Mass Effect
    Medal of Honor: Airborne
    Metro 2033
    Mobile Suit Gundam: Crossfire
    Monster Madness: Battle for Suburbia
    Monster Truck Maniax
    Myst Online: URU Live
    Open Fire
    Paragraph 78
    Pirates of the Burning Sea
    PT Boats: Knights of the Sea
    Rail Simulator
    Red Steel
    Rise Of Nations: Rise Of Legends
    Roboblitz
    Sacred 2
    Sherlock Holmes: The Awakened
    Showdown: Scorpion
    Silverfall
    Sovereign Symphony
    Speedball 2
    Stalin Subway, The
    Stoked Rider: Alaska Alien
    Switchball
    Tension
    Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter
    Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2
    Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Vegas
    Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Double Agent
    Tortuga: Two Treasures
    Two Worlds
    Ultra Tubes
    Unreal Tournament 3
    Warfare
    Warmonger: Operation Downtown Destruction
    W.E.L.L. Online
    Winterheart's Guild
    WorldShift
    Does this answer your question?


    Oh, and does have CUDA double precision FP?
    Who cares? The world supports it anyway.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    91

    Default AMD is champ on linux

    RealNC,

    Last time I checked, Phoronix was for linux users. ATI is far superior when it comes to openness. Just today they released 3D specs for all their latest cards... good luck getting that from Nvidia.

    Few of those games you listed even run on linux, so nobody here should care about them. The ones that do run on linux are nowhere near demanding enough to actually need dedicated physics processing.

    We value freedom, and as such we would rather see OpenCL and ATI's FOSS drivers succeed.

    PhysX et al, are just a phase until true heterogenous computing takes over. Intel's Larrabee and AMD's upcoming offerings are far more exciting, and that sort of stuff will require OpenCL to really succeed, and everyone knows it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •