Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope Alpha 4 Released

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,410

    Default Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope Alpha 4 Released

    Phoronix: Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope Alpha 4 Released

    Not only did Fedora 11 Alpha make it out the door today, but so did the fourth alpha release for Ubuntu 9.04 (the Jaunty Jackalope). Ubuntu 9.04 Alpha 4 continues to build upon a bleeding-edge set of Linux packages (though still tracking the Linux 2.6.28 kernel) and has installation support for the EXT4 file-system and new notification capabilities.The announcement of Ubuntu 9.04 Alpha 4 can be found on ubuntu-devel-announce...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzA0Mw

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    598

    Default

    Is Ubuntu bleeding edge?

    I thought the only bleeding edge distribution was Fedora.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    677

    Default

    What does this font optimization really mean?

    Better fonts for netbooks? Because I don't recall having font size issues.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,281

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Louise View Post
    Is Ubuntu bleeding edge?

    I thought the only bleeding edge distribution was Fedora.
    Ubuntu is often bleeding-edge at Alpha stage, but by release time it's more like "progressive". The same could probably be said for some other distros.

    Fedora is often bleeding edge at release as well.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vadi View Post
    What does this font optimization really mean?

    Better fonts for netbooks? Because I don't recall having font size issues.
    It means that text will have the same size regardless of your monitor's dimensions and resolution. 1920x1200 resolution on a 15.4'' laptop? No problem! Your text will have the same size as on a 1280x800 monitor, but it will be *much* more readable (cleaner outlines, fewer color artifacts, more accurate shapes).

    Try the same on Windows, or older versions of Ubuntu for that matter, and text will be unreadably small at 96DPI.

    If this works as advertized, and if it also affects icons, window size, etc, Ubuntu will be the first distribution shipping with true resolution independence out of the box! Not even MacOS has managed to do that yet (and Windows are far behind in that regard).
    Last edited by BlackStar; 02-05-2009 at 02:32 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    It means that text will have the same size regardless of your monitor's dimensions and resolution. 1920x1200 resolution on a 15.4'' laptop? No problem! Your text will have the same size as on a 1280x800 monitor, but it will be *much* more readable (cleaner outlines, fewer color artifacts, more accurate shapes).
    Finally!!! I've been "waiting" for this for _years_ (maybe 5?) for my 1920x1200 15" laptop screen. What I do is manually boost fonts size.

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    [...], and text will be unreadably small at 96DPI.
    Not 96 dpi, 146!!! Even more unreadable.

    Text is nice and crisp you can't even imagine. 1920x1200 is a higher resolution then 50" HD tv, but on a 15.4" monitor!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    233

    Default

    How do they know which DPI configuration is the best for the resolution being used?

    And also which is the best counts per inch of a mouse using a specific resolution, could this be messed?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Haifa
    Posts
    55

    Default

    It would be nice if either it installed properly, or if someone were reading the bug reports of it no installing properly:
    https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s...ty/+bug/319390

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KDesk View Post
    How do they know which DPI configuration is the best for the resolution being used?

    And also which is the best counts per inch of a mouse using a specific resolution, could this be messed?
    It uses EDID information from the monitor I believe. In my experience, this has always been flawless with LCD monitors, but I have had a lot of problems with DPI, refresh rate and resolution settings on some CRTs.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •