Doesn't look faster to me.
Phoronix: Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 512MB GDDR4
Back in September we reviewed the Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 graphics card that offered 512MB of GDDR3 memory. Overall, this RV730-based graphics card had performed well under Linux and not a bad investment with it retailing for about $80 USD. Sapphire Technology though has now introduced a new version of the Radeon HD 4670 that sports 512MB of GDDR4 memory. Will switching out the GDDR3 for GDDR4 memory have much of an overall impact on this graphics card? We have the results in this article.
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=13482
Doesn't look faster to me.
Ok, I know I am a bit pedantic, but the nixe bars are labeled:
hd4650 ddr3, hd4670 ddr3 hd4830 ddr3 AND: HD4_8_70 DDR4.
i think they are alphabetically ordered, so the order is also a bit
confusing.
I wish the GDDR3 version had that fan. The one I've got is noisy as hell and I'll have to replace it once I start using it more often.
Why is a 4830 stomping all over a 4870?
Last edited by bridgman; 02-11-2009 at 01:25 PM.
Am I the only one seeing this article bug?
Screenshot of page 1 (zoomed out to fit in my screen):
As you can see, somehow the graphs of page 4 are embedded there. This happens on all pages -except- page 4. Also the first time I see this on Phoronix.
hi!
what is the length of this card?
i would like to put it in this asus t3 system: http://www.asus.com/products.aspx?l1...52&modelmenu=1
it's ultimately pointless to buy any ati card if you want to use it under linux compared to nvidia, lack of good drivers seem to make their cards worthless.
It would be good to see phoronix include some tests of popular games under Wine, when they review video cards if they want to give Linux users good information.
Eg. WoW, CS, CS:S, CoD4, Eve, Guild Wars.