Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: X Server 1.6 Gets A Bit Closer To Release

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,108

    Default X Server 1.6 Gets A Bit Closer To Release

    Phoronix: X Server 1.6 Gets A Bit Closer To Release

    X Server 1.6 was supposed to be released by the end of 2008 as Intel had called for it to be a strictly time-based release. However, the release schedule ended up putting it as a early January release (the 5th of January to be exact)...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzA3Mw

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    772

    Default

    Once released, X Server 1.6 brings [...] Direct Rendering Infrastructure 2 [...] to the desktops of Linux users.
    This is still limited to Intel IGP users, right?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    677

    Default

    I read that Ubuntu already has 1.6. Nvidia just released a driver that supports it a few days ago, ATI has yet to.

    Why can't they just stick with 1.5? Xorg / ATI drivers / whatever distro-specific thingamajig failing on install is a very common problem new users I'm in contact with are encountering.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    404

    Default

    Isn't 1.7 supposed to be out soon according to the original plan? They are really running behind. There really need to be more devs working on the xserver.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    117

    Default

    Do you happen to know if Fedora will be introducing 1.6 in Fedora 10, or waiting for F11?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    897

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vadi View Post
    Why can't they just stick with 1.5?
    Because OSS developers can do forced obsolescence better than their proprietary counterparts.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    37

    Question Looking for the Gestalt

    [QUOTE=phoronix;63292]Phoronix: X Server 1.6 Gets A Bit Closer To Release

    X Server 1.6 was supposed to be released by the end of 2008 as Intel had called for it to be a strictly time-based release. However, the release schedule ended up putting it as a early January release (the 5th of January to be exact)...

    There are so many versions and extensions to X, I'd like to see Phoronix do an article that relates all the work going on in X (X11, Mesa, R&R, GEM, ...) I think others like me would like to be educated on how they are dependent, inter-related, the state of each one, and how binary drivers from ATI and Nvidia correlate to them.

    It would be nice to see all this info come together in one article and it seems Phoronix has the expertise to do it.

    Please consider this request Phoronix.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,185

    Default

    DarkCloud, you do realize it would be something like 30 pages long if it were to cover everything? And that it would take weeks to write comprehensively

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Yet, it would be an awsome reading ;]

    I, for one, would really like to know how are the binary blobs different. I remember people stating that these don't use Mesa and work quite a lot differently than normal drivers, but no details are ever mentioned.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    151

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by szczerb View Post
    Yet, it would be an awsome reading ;]

    I, for one, would really like to know how are the binary blobs different. I remember people stating that these don't use Mesa and work quite a lot differently than normal drivers, but no details are ever mentioned.
    From what I've understood, the xserver has a big function table with pointers to all the functions. Mesa has a software implementation that is the default, but the proprietary drivers override many more functions than open source drivers. Since all you got are pointers to a blob, I guess there's really not that much useful to say about it other than "they're doing that themselves". That way they can choose to only use part of Mesa in a proprietary/Mesa hybrid.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •