Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Maximum virtual size, radeonhd

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    148

    Default Maximum virtual size, radeonhd

    Hey,
    Here I read the following:
    Note that the maximum supported size of the virtual desktop for the Intel 945GM series of chipset with 3D acceleration enabled, is 2048x2048. The virtual screen can be larger but DRI will be disabled.
    Now I wonder: how big can the virtual screen size be when using radeonhd (or xf86-video-radeonhd) without losing DRI? Or isn't it a driver limitation, but rather a limitation of the grapich card?

    Edit: Woops. I wonder if DRI is available at all in radeonhd..

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,102

    Default

    It's both card- and driver-dependant; the card puts the max bar in, and the driver can support that or something less. R500 class cards have 4096x4096 3d.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    148

    Default

    Thanks. Is this documentated somewhere?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    It's mentioned on page 7 of the 5xx acceleration guide v1.3. The change actually happened between 3xx and 4xx (at least that's what the doc says ).

    http://www.x.org/docs/AMD/

    DRI is fully supported in radeonhd since release 1.2.2, at least for GPUs up to 5xx and 690. Earlier versions (before 1.2.2) had support for DRI but the 2D acceleration paths could not use drm, so you could not have 2D and 3D acceleration at the same time.

    DRI support for 6xx and 7xx is in the "6xx-7xx-support" development branch. You also need the corresponding 6xx-7xx-support branch of drm. We don't have working mesa support for 6xx/7xx but that is getting closer; we're drawing triangles in house and might get glxgears running next week.
    Last edited by bridgman; 02-15-2009 at 02:39 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    148

    Default

    I see. Thank you (again)!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Nurnberg.
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Martje,

    You're free to tell the driver whatever virtual you like. My code does the right thing and clamps down to the limits possible (another area in which it is quite unique). With 2d acceleration enabled, the limits are 4095x4095 if memory serves.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    822

    Default

    Depending on hardware/driver you may be limited to 2560x2560 resolution, see freedesktop bug 14099

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •