Catalyst 9.2 Released, Still Fails To Deliver XvBA
Phoronix: Catalyst 9.2 Released, Still Fails To Deliver XvBA
A day after the ATI Catalyst 9.2 driver update was issued for Windows, Catalyst 9.2 for Linux is now available. However, there really isn't much at all to see with this release...
No real changes :-/
Well maybe it is time to buy some other graphic card. i wish Intel would build motherboards with a IGP. :-(
What about this title:
Catalyst 9.2 Released: The NeverEnding Failure.
I also love this Known Issue that they state in their Release Notes:
"With some system configurations Catalyst Control Center may take up to 30 seconds to start."
I wonder how "dirty" is fglrx code. I think they can't handle the code anymore for how bad/messed up it is.
Last edited by bulletxt; 02-20-2009 at 04:03 PM.
CCC takes like 15sec. to load on my main machine (Intrepid 64bit), yet it loads instantly on my laptop (Intrepid 32bit). This only really started happening since 9.1 really. Go figure.
Canabyst 1.0omega Released: HI! We are completely new dev team.
Last edited by dungeon; 02-20-2009 at 04:41 PM.
More or less the same as 9.1, except:
* aticonfig now, for the first time, says that POWERplay is not supported by my GPU. Strangely, I've been using POWERplay for many fglrx-releases (via the old atieventsd method), but support is obviously completely gone now. Even more funny is that "Auto powerstates" still seems to be enabled by default, and this crashes X when I unplug AC. So I still need to do an "aticonfig --auto-powerstates=off" to get stable operation, even though the driver says POWERplay is unsupported with "aticonfig --lsp" !
Otherwise, much the same. XVideo still unusably slow with Compiz, works OK without.
A few positive points:
* General performance is obviously improved in the later Catalyst-releases, both 2D and 3D, it's never been this good before (if disregarding video). Easily noticable when using Compiz.
* Execpt for the problems mentioned above, the driver is stable, even if running Compiz and using suspend/resume.
ATI X1400 Radeon mobile, Ubuntu 8.10 x86.
Funny drivers There is so much bugs and everybody waits and they only fix the minor things. Sixteen bug in 21 days it isn't even a one poor bug per day. There is only one i can say:
Choose nvidia, have no problems I did so, now it's you turn ...
Last edited by NSLW; 02-20-2009 at 05:32 PM.
One cannot always choose that easily.. I have nvidia on some machines, and I'm very pleased with that. The ATI-card is in my work laptop, and it's a Lenovo that I really like, and I chose it because it's generally nice Also, Lenovo's nvidia-offerings were few and far apart at the time (couple of years ago, I guess).
Originally Posted by NSLW
However, life is not care-free with nVidia binary driver. Look at nvnews-forum, and you'll see quite a lot of people having problems with nvidia as well. I have another laptop with a nVidia GeForce Go 6600 in it, and only just now, with the latest 180.29-driver, and after quite a few years(!), are things working without any significant problem (except for VCs getting garbled beyond recognition when X initializes , and xrandr shows no available resolutions except flat panel native). Luck, if you can call it that, most definitely plays a role with nvidia-hw+Linux as well.
Last edited by oyvind; 02-20-2009 at 05:45 PM.
Reason: Typo ..